Skip to main content

Table 5 Satellite image to ground total fuel density (TFD; kg m−3) and canopy bulk density (CBD; kg m−3) model calibration results using field data collected in 2015 and 2016. Results used to evaluate the potential for mapping coniferous fuel density across the Superior National Forest, Minnesota, USA. Models for TFD and CBD are denoted T and C, respectively, while numbers 1, 12, and 123 reference the zenith angle range used for canopy gap fraction measurements: 0 to 7°, 0 to 23°, and 0 to 38°, respectively. FuelCalc-derived estimates of CBD are denoted FC. LANDFIRE’s CBD estimates (LF) for our plot locations are shown for comparison; dashes (–) indicate no data. Descriptive model statistics include mean and maximum (Max) fuel density (kg m−3), standard deviation (SD), adjusted coefficient of determination (Adj R2), root mean squared error (RMSE; kg m−3), cross-validation predicted error sum of squared (PRESS), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). The number of initial (iVar) and final (fVar) image predictor variables retained and the number of latent component variables (Comp) used in each of the final models are given

From: Modeling sub-boreal forest canopy bulk density in Minnesota, USA, using synthetic aperture radar and optical satellite sensor data

Model

Mean

Max

SD

iVar

fVar

Comp

Adj R2

RMSE

PRESS

AIC

BIC

LF

0.108

0.300

0.048

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

FC

0.999

2.991

0.787

66

29

25

0.961

0.165

0.375

−155.0

125.5

T1

0.669

1.037

0.154

66

11

3

0.340

0.122

0.833

−226.0

53.3

T12

1.432

2.466

0.435

66

16

15

0.769

0.209

0.631

−152.9

71.6

T123

2.158

3.468

0.726

66

23

18

0.869

0.242

0.575

−121.3

99.5

C1

0.472

0.934

0.210

66

32

24

0.950

0.048

0.463

−299.7

142.9

C12

1.035

2.492

0.583

66

36

28

0.974

0.072

0.418

−236.9

157.3

C123

1.596

3.000

0.743

66

38

30

0.978

0.103

0.378

−194.3

164.2