- Original research
- Open access
- Published:
A framework for natural resource management with geospatial machine learning: a case study of the 2021 Almora forest fires
Fire Ecology volume 20, Article number: 78 (2024)
Abstract
Background
Wildfires have a substantial impact on air quality and ecosystems by releasing greenhouse gases (GHGs), trace gases, and aerosols into the atmosphere. These wildfires produce both light-absorbing and merely scattering aerosols that can act as cloud condensation nuclei, altering cloud reflectivity, cloud lifetime, and precipitation frequency. Uttarakhand province in India experiences frequent wildfires that affect its protected ecosystems. Thus, a natural resource management system is needed in this region to assess the impact of wildfire hazards on land and atmosphere. We conducted an analysis of a severe fire event that occurred between January and April 2021 in the Kumaun region of Uttarakhand, by utilizing open-source geospatial data. Near-real-time satellite observations of pre- and post-fire conditions within the study area were used to detect changes in land and atmosphere. Supervised machine learning algorithm was also implemented to estimate burned above ground biomass (AGB) to monitor biomass stock.
Results
The study found that 21.75% of the total burned area burned with moderate to high severity, resulting in a decreased Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index value (> 0.3), a reduced Normalized Differential Moisture Index value (> 0.4), and a lowered Normalized Differential Vegetation Index (> 0.5). The AGB estimate demonstrated a significant simple determination (r2 = 0.001702) and probability (P < 2.2 10−16), along with a positive correlation (r ≤ 0.24) with vegetation and soil indices. The algorithm predicted that 17.56 tonnes of biomass per hectare burned in the Kumaun forests. This fire incident resulted in increased emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2; ~ 0.8 10−4 kg carbon h−1), methane (CH4; ~ 200 10−9 mol fraction in dry air), carbon monoxide (CO; 2000 1015 molecules cm−2 total column), and formaldehyde (HCHO; 3500 1013 molecules cm−2 total column), along with increased aerosol optical thickness (varying from 0.2 to 0.5).
Conclusions
We believe that our proposed operational framework for managing natural resources and assessing the impact of natural hazards can be used to efficiently monitor near-real-time forest-fire-caused changes in land and atmosphere. This method makes use of openly accessible geospatial data that can be employed for several objectives, including monitoring carbon stocks, greenhouse gas emissions, criterion air pollution, and radiative forcing of the climate, among many others. Our proposed framework will assist policymakers and the scientific community in mitigating climate change problems and in developing adaptation policies.
Resumen
Antecedentes
Los fuegos de vegetación tienen un impacto substancial en la calidad del aire y en los ecosistemas mediante la liberación, en la atmósfera, de gases de efecto invernadero (GHGs), gases traza, y aerosoles. Estos fuegos producen tanto partículas ligeras que son absorbidas por la luz como meramente aerosoles dispersos que pueden actuar como núcleos de condensación de nubes, alterando la reflectancia, el tiempo de vida de las nubes, y la frecuencia de la precipitación. La provincia de Uttarakhand en la India experimenta frecuentes incendios de vegetación que afectan sus ecosistemas protegidos. Es necesario entonces, contar con un sistema de manejo para la región para determinar el impacto del riesgo de incendio tanto en los ecosistemas terrestres como en la atmósfera. Condujimos un análisis de un evento de incendio severo que ocurrió entre enero y abril de 2021 en la región Kumaun de la provincia de Uttarakhand, mediante la utilización de datos geoespaciales abiertos. Observaciones de satélite en casi tiempo real de condiciones previas al- y post- fuego dentro del área d estudios fueron usados detectar cambios en los ecosistemas terrestres y en la atmósfera. Algoritmos de técnicas de aprendizaje supervisado fueron también implementados para estimar lo quemado por encima de la biomasa aérea (AGB9 para monitorear las reservas de biomasa.
Resultados
El estudio encontró que el 21.75% del área total se quemó a severidades de moderadas a altas, resultando en un valor decrecido del Índice de humedad diferencial del suelo normalizado (< 0.3), un valor reducido del Índice de Humedad normalizado (< 0.4), y un bajo Índice de Vegetación Normalizad de (< 0.5 de NDVI). La estimación del AGB demostró una determinación significative simple (r2 = 0.001702) y una probabilidad (P < 2.2 ´ 10 − 16), junto con una correlación positiva (r ≤ 0.24) con los Índices de suelo y vegetación. El algoritmo predijo que 17,56 toneladas de biomasa por ha se quemaron en los bosques de Kumaun. Este incidente de incendio resultó en incrementos en las emisiones de dióxido de carbono (CO2 ~ 0,8 ´ 10 − 4 kg carbon h − 1), metano (CH4; ~ 200 ´ 10 − 9 mol en aire seco), monóxido de carbono (CO; 2000 ´ 1015 moléculas cm − 2 en el total de la columna), y formaldehido (HCHO; 3500 ´ 1013 moleculas cm − 2 en la columna total), junto con incrementos en el espesor de los aerosoles ópticos (variación entre 0.2 a 0.5).
Conclusiones
Creemos que nuestro marco operacional propuesto para manejar los recursos naturales y determinar el impacto de los riesgos naturales pueden ser usados para monitorear eficientemente en casi tiempo real los cambios causados por los fuegos de vegetación tanto en los ecosistemas terrestres como en la atmósfera. Este método usa datos geoespaciales accesibles abiertos que pueden ser usados para diversos objetivos, incluyendo las existencias de carbono, las emisiones de GHGs, criterios de contaminación del aire, y forzantes radiativos del clima, entre muchos otros. Nuestro marco conceptual propuesto podrá asistir a los tomadores de decisiones y a la comunidad científica en la mitigación de los problemas del cambio climático y en el desarrollo de políticas de adaptación.
Background
Forest fires are a widespread phenomenon globally, encompassing both immediate and long-term ramifications for the ecosystem. The consequences of forest fires exhibit a wide range of effects, including changes in above ground biomass (AGB) (Amiro et al. 2000, 2001; Pérez-Cabello et al. 2012), as well as reductions in subterranean physical, chemical, and microbial processes (Cerdà 1998; Aaltonen et al. 2019). Forest fires also generate significant quantities of trace gases and particulate matter. These emissions contribute to the deterioration of both local and regional air quality, while also affecting the global climate (Bae et al. 2019; Yin et al. 2019; Datta 2021).
Forest fires can lead to extreme climatic events, such as more frequent and intense droughts, heat waves, rising sea levels, and melting glaciers. The occurrence of these events poses substantial threats to global livelihoods (Versini et al. 2013; Sharma and Pant 2017; Heyer et al. 2018; Berenguer et al. 2021; Nojarov and Nikolova 2022; Sharifi 2022; Turco et al. 2023). The impacts of forest fires can endure for extended periods, resulting in a decline in net ecosystem productivity over the long run (Taylor et al. 2014; Pellegrini et al. 2018).
In recent times, researchers from around the globe have acquired an understanding of the pivotal role played by forests in mitigating climate change (dos Reis et al. 2021; Kolanek et al. 2021). According to the India State of Forest Report 2021 (https://fsi.nic.in/forest-report-2021-details), forests account for 23.58% of India’s total geographical area; understanding carbon stock is crucial for comprehending the dynamics of forest stands, their productive capacity, and sustainable management (Zheng et al. 2016; Kirchmeier-Young et al. 2019; Wang and Zhang 2020).
Numerous studies have verified that satellite imagery has the ability to measure the effects of fire across vast areas and diverse ecosystems. Satellite-based fire monitoring serves as a valuable strategy in fire management and decision support systems, given its capacity to cover large areas, including inaccessible locations, with high temporal precision (Agus et al. 2020). The utilization of remotely sensed data in fire management encompasses mapping burn severity, detecting hot spots in forest fires, identifying smoke, and managing pre-fire conditions. Various satellite sensors, such as polar-orbiting sensors (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer, MODIS; Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer, AVHRR; the Landsat series; the Sentinels satellites; Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite, VIIRS) and geostationary sensor systems (Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite, GOES; Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager, SEVIRI; Communication, Ocean and Meteorological Satellite, COMS; Himawari-8), have been employed for forest fire detection. On-board satellite sensors capture vertical views of the Earth’s surface and provide multi-band images in spectral regions such as short-wave infrared (SWIR), near-infrared (NIR), mid-infrared (MIR), and long-wave infrared (LWIR), facilitating in-depth monitoring of pre- and post-fire dynamics.
The utilization of machine learning algorithms in conjunction with satellite-derived data has emerged as a prominent methodology for estimating the impacts of forest fires. Machine learning, which falls within the realm of artificial intelligence in computer science, entails the utilization of machines or computers to think and respond in a manner akin to the human mind. This enables software applications to enhance their accuracy in predicting outcomes without explicit programming. Machine learning algorithms employ historical data as input to forecast new output values. The learning process involves training the system through supervised or unsupervised learning. The application of these algorithms varies depending on the purpose and type of data being utilized. Linear regression, logistic regression, random forest, k-mean clustering, and decision trees are among the algorithms that fall within the framework of machine learning.
Jang et al. (2019) proposed a threshold-based random forest machine learning system for identifying fires in South Korea using geostationary satellites. Geostationary satellite data may exhibit a high false alarm rate when identifying fire pixels, but the use of machine learning models has significantly mitigated this issue. Van Hoang et al. (2020) employed multi-criteria analysis of individual forest-fire-related characteristics to determine the causes of frequent forest fires in Vietnam, utilizing Landsat-7 data. However, the temporal coverage of Landsat-7 satellite is deficient in terms of revisiting the area of interest, thereby limiting its effectiveness for continuous monitoring. Rabiei et al. (2022) conducted a study to determine the effect of forest fires on droughts by examining fire risk zones in Golestan, Iran, utilizing ecological indicators and precipitation data from 2005 to 2020. Ghorbanzadesh et al. (2019) utilized machine learning and geographic information system multi-criteria decision-making techniques, incorporating environmental and land use data, in order to propose a social vulnerability index and a forest fire susceptibility index.
Post-fire dynamics involve the impacts of fire emissions on the atmosphere, which play a critical role in the degradation of local air quality. Emissions of pollutants during a forest fire event affect the radiative forcing of the climate (Haywood et al. 1999). Forest fires directly emit particulate matter (PM), as well as numerous gaseous compounds. Notable gaseous compounds generated during wildfires include carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), methane (CH4), and hundreds of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including a significant number of oxygenated VOCs (Lazaridis et al. 2008). This chemical complexity sets wildfire smoke apart from typical industrial pollution.
Noyes et al. (2020) employed multi-angle imaging spectroradiometer data to analyze the evolution of smoke plumes, including size-selective deposition, new-particle formation, and the locations within the plume where particulate pollutants dominate. A significant challenge in understanding the impact of fires on air quality arises from the substantial variability observed from one fire to another, in terms of both the quantity and composition of emissions. According to the CORINAIR 1990 (Grösslinger et al. 1996) inventory, forest fires in 1990 contributed approximately 0.2% of NOx, 0.5% of non-methane VOCs, 0.2% of CH4, 1.9% of CO, 1.2% of nitrous oxide (N2O), and 0.1% of ammonia (NH3) in Europe (Wang et al. 2020). The adverse effects of these brief emissions within a confined region can have a more profound impact on public health, specifically impacts leading to respiratory symptoms and illnesses such as bronchitis, asthma, pneumonia, upper respiratory infection, and impaired lung function, as well as cardiac diseases.
In contrast to other sources of human-induced emissions, the measurement and evaluation of emissions from forest and agricultural biomass fires are lacking in scholarly literature due to the difficulties associated with estimating their temporal and spatial distribution. Dispersion modeling of emitted substances is complicated by the burning processes involved. The act of burning consists of multiple stages, each producing distinct compounds, while the burned material itself is heterogeneous and resistant to mathematical description. Consequently, significant disparities between predicted and observed levels of air pollution may arise. Numerous researchers have employed machine learning algorithms to evaluate the impact of fires on air quality (Ma et al. 2020; Mohajane et al. 2021; Bar et al. 2022).
The goal of our investigation was twofold: (1) to examine the consequences of a severe forest fire event that occurred between January and April 2021 in the Almora district of Uttarakhand, India, through the utilization of multiple satellite observations; and (2) to develop a machine learning based method for tracking the forest-fire caused alterations in ecological assets using satellite images.
Methods
Study site
Uttarakhand is geographically located between latitudes 28.716667 to 31.45 and longitudes 77.566667 to 81.03333334 in northern India. It shares borders with Tibet and China to the north, Nepal to the east, the Indian state of Himachal Pradesh to the west, and the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh to the south. The state of Uttarakhand is primarily characterized by lofty mountains and rugged terrain, which account for 93% of its total area. The elevation within Uttarakhand ranges from 300 to 7816 m above sea level, this significant variation in topography giving rise to diverse ecosystems within the state. The recorded forest area in Uttarakhand measures 24,240 km2, representing 45.32% of its overall geographical expanse (Forest Survey of India 2015).
Broadly, Uttarakhand can be classified into six major vegetation types, corresponding to elevation. Above an elevation of 4500 m, the state is predominantly covered by ice, glaciers, and rocky landscapes. The western Himalayan alpine shrub and meadows can be found between elevations of 3000 m and 4500 m. The temperate western Himalayan subalpine conifer forests exist within the range of 2600 m to 3000 m, forming a tree line below the upper, treeless meadows. Between 1500 to 2600 m, one can find the temperate western Himalayan broadleaf forests. The Himalayan sub-tropical pine forests extend from 900 to 1500 m. The lower Himalayas or Upper Gangetic plains are characterized by dry and moist deciduous forests. The lowlands of the state, adjacent to Uttar Pradesh, are covered by dry savannas and grasslands.
Forest fires in Uttarakhand occur during fall (October through December, post-monsoon) and summer (March through May, pre-monsoon) seasons. Steep terrain, high summer temperatures, strong winds, and the presence of flammable materials contribute to significant impact from, and extensive spread of, forest fires in Uttarakhand. In mountainous areas, forest fires tend to spread rapidly uphill due to the upward flow of hot air, resulting in moisture loss and elevated temperatures in the upper regions. Additionally, isolated trees found at higher elevations and shrubs located at lower elevations exhibit a significant vulnerability to ignition as a result of their diminished levels of moisture, increasing their likelihood of combustion. Furthermore, rolling and burning forest material promote and re-ignite fire at new locations downslope.
Longleaf Indian pine (Pinus roxburghii Sarg.) forests having high inflammable resin content are also highly susceptible to forest fires. Most of the forest fires are caused by human activities. Some fires are accidental, but most of the fires are initiated deliberately for some purpose such as to collect sal (Shorea robusta Roth) seeds left after the forest is burned, to conceal illegal timber extraction, to improve grass growth, to scare away wild animals, etc. The number of fire events in Uttarakhand is reported to have increased due to increased anthropogenic disturbances as well as changes in climate. These fires cause significant impacts to natural resources, which can be mapped and monitored using satellite images (Fig. 1).
The commencement of this fire outbreak in our study dates back to October 2020 and persisted until April 2021. Initially confined to specific locations within the region in from October through December 2020, the fire gradually expanded to a considerable portion of Almora forests in January 2021. Subsequent to mid-January, the intensity of the fire escalated, and the fire continued to grow until April 2021. This incident resulted in the scorching of a total area measuring 478,449.1 ha in Almora forests, exhibiting varying degrees of severity, and significantly influencing the climatic equilibrium of the region.
Sentinel-2
Sentinel-2 satellites have been specifically engineered to provide land remote sensing data for the Copernicus program of the European Commission (https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/Copernicus/Introducing_Copernicus). The objective of the Sentinel-2 mission entails the utilization of two satellites in order to facilitate vegetation, land cover, and environmental monitoring. The initial satellite, Sentinel-2A, was successfully launched by the European Space Agency on 23 June 2015 and is currently operating in a sun-synchronous orbit with a repetition cycle of 10 days. The second satellite, Sentinel-2B, identical to its predecessor, was launched on 7 March 2017. Together, these satellites effectively cover all land surfaces, large islands, and inland and coastal waters of the Earth every 5 days.
The Multi Spectral Instrument of the Sentinel-2 satellites captures data from 13 spectral bands spanning from the visible and near-infrared (NIR) to the shortwave infrared (SWIR) wavelengths (Table 1). These spectral bands have a coverage width of 290 km along their orbital path. The spectral band classification of the Sentinel-2 satellites is composed of four bands with a resolution of 10 m: blue (band 2, B2, 490 nm), green (band 3, B3, 560 nm), red (band 4, B4, 665 nm), and near-infrared (NIR, band 8, B8, 842 nm). Additionally, there are six bands with a resolution of 20 m, which consist of four narrow bands utilized for vegetation characterization (red-edge, band 5, B5, 705 nm; NIR, band 6, B6, 740 nm; NIR, band 7, B7, 783 nm; and NIR, band 8a, B8a, 865 nm) and two larger SWIR bands (band 11, B11, 1610 nm; and band 12, B12, 2190 nm) employed for applications such as snow or ice or cloud detection and vegetation moisture stress assessment. Lastly, three bands with a resolution of 60 m are primarily used for cloud screening and atmospheric corrections: 443 nm for aerosol detection (ultra blue, band 1, B1), 945 nm for water vapor analysis (SWIR, band 9, B9), and 1375 nm for cirrus cloud detection (SWIR, band 10, B10). The four bands with a resolution of 10 m have been specially designed to delineate the fundamental classes of land cover. Similarly, the six bands with a resolution of 20 m fulfill the criteria for enhanced land-cover classification and the retrieval of geophysical parameters. On the other hand, the bands with a resolution of 60 m are primarily dedicated to atmospheric corrections and cirrus-cloud screening. For a concise overview of the band information of the Sentinel-2 satellites, please refer to Table 1.
In our study, we utilized two Sentinel-2 images from within the designated study area: a pre-fire image and a post-fire image. The pre-fire image was acquired by Sentinel-2A on 16 January 2021, while the post-fire image was retrieved on 1 April 2021. Both of these Sentinel-2A-acquired images underwent processing in SNAP (Sentinel Application Platform; https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/tools/snap), including cloud correction, resampling, and subsetting to band numbers 3, 8, and 12.
It is known that healthy vegetation exhibits high reflectance in the visible spectrum but low reflectance in the shortwave infrared (SWIR) portion. Conversely, burned areas tend to display relatively low reflectance in the near-infrared (NIR) band and heightened reflectance in the SWIR bands. To assess changes in forest fire parameters, we employed various indices. One such index was the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), which measures the greenness and density of vegetation (Rouse et al. 1974). Chlorophyll has a strong tendency to absorb visible light, while the cell structure of leaves strongly reflects NIR light. When a plant experiences dehydration, it absorbs more NIR light rather than reflecting it. In the case of Sentinel-2, the NDVI is calculated by combining the NIR and red bands. Specifically, the NDVI from Sentinel-2 can be computed using the B8 band (NIR) and the B4 band (Red) with Eq. 1:
Gao (1996) introduced the Normalized Difference Moisture Index, known as NDMI, which defines moisture levels using the NIR and shortwave infrared SWIR bands. While NIR reflectance is affected by leaf internal structure and dry-matter content, rather than water content, the SWIR band reflects changes in both vegetation water content and the spongy mesophyll structure in vegetation canopies. The combination of NIR and SWIR enhances the accuracy of determining vegetation water content by eliminating variations caused by leaf internal structure and dry-matter content. The SWIR region of the electromagnetic spectrum primarily depends on the water content present in the internal leaf structure, resulting in a negative correlation between leaf water content and SWIR reflectance. NDMI can be computed using Sentinel-2 B8 (NIR) and B11 (SWIR) (Eq. 2):
Delegido et al. (2011) introduced an optimal index known as the Normalized Difference Index 45 (NDI45). Canopy chlorophyll content and leaf chlorophyll concentration can indicate plant health and potential gross primary productivity (Gitelson et al. 2006), while Leaf Area Index (LAI) provides insight into canopy function and structure (Wilhelm et al. 2000). Land cover (including vegetation type), LAI, and the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation are Essential Climate Variables within the Global Climate Observing System required by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (https://library.wmo.int/idurl/4/58703). NDI45 offers the possibility of estimating leaf area index (LAI) with greater precision due to the utilization of the red-edge band (B5). NDI45 exhibits a more linear relationship and lower saturation at higher values compared to the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). NDI45 can be calculated using reference band B5 (red-edge; R) and B8 (NIR) with the following formula (Eq. 3):
In contrast to empirically derived NDVI products, the Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) provides a more stable parameter for studying vegetation as it accounts for variations in soil color, soil moisture, and saturation effects caused by dense vegetation. In an effort to improve NDVI, Huete (1988) developed a vegetation index that considers the differential extinction of red and near-infrared wavelengths through the vegetation canopy. This index is a transformation technique that reduces the influence of spectral vegetation caused by red and near-infrared (NIR) wavelength soil brightness indices. The following formula (Eq. 4) can be used to calculate SAVI using Sentinel-2 B8 (NIR) and B4 (Red) bands:
where L is an index value dependent upon the amount of green vegetation cover.
Several other parameters, such as aerosol optical thickness (AOT), Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR), and above ground biomass (AGB), have been used by numerous researchers to quantify the impact of forest fires in different application domains.
Sentinel-5P
The Sentinel-5P satellite provides precise and detailed measurements of various atmospheric parameters such as air quality, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, ozone, and climate forcing. The TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) imaging spectrometer, located on board the Sentinel-5P satellite, covers specific wavelength bands ranging from UV to SWIR channels. These bands include UV-1 (270 to 300 nm), UV-2 (300 to 370 nm), VIS (370 to 500 nm), NIR-1 (685 to 710 nm), NIR-2 (755 to 773 nm), SWIR-1 (1590 to 1675 nm), and SWIR-3 (2305 to2385 nm). The primary aim of this sensor is to monitor the presence of trace gases in the atmosphere, with the intention of managing air quality. To accomplish this, the sensor employs passive remote sensing techniques to measure the solar radiation reflected by and radiated from the Earth’s atmosphere at the top of the atmosphere. The obtained data is used to monitor concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3); the UV aerosol index; and various geophysical parameters of clouds. The spatial resolution of the measurements is below 8 km for wavelengths above 300 nm, and below 50 km for wavelengths below 300 nm. The impact of forest fire events has been investigated using measurements of columnar HCHO molecules, columnar CO, and mole fraction of CH4 in dry air obtained from the TROPOMI on the Sentinel-5P satellite. For our analysis, we utilized the Sentinel-5P products both before and after the fire event, specifically focusing on the designated region of interest to study the emissive effects. The data products were processed in the R programming language (R Core Team 2020) using the S5P_process library, which is specifically designed for post processing of Sentinel-5P data. The processing workflow includes resampling, masking the area of interest, and applying a scale factor to the measured values according to the specified syntax:
S5P_process(input, product, my_res, my_aoi, extent_only, ref_raster, interpol_method, apply_scale_factor)
Orbiting carbon observatory
The compound CO2, which is a significant constituent of GHGs (Greenhouse gases), exhibits only minimal fluctuations over a span of 2 to 3 months. Nevertheless, in the context of its correlation with forest fires, the Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) data on CO2 concentrations was utilized to examine its presence pre and post-fire in the region of Uttarakhand. The OCO-2 dataset provides bias-corrected measurements of CO2 with a temporal resolution of 1 day. The Orbiting Carbon Observatory represents the inaugural National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) mission that was been specifically designed to gather space-based assessments of atmospheric carbon dioxide with utmost precision, resolution, and coverage. It encompasses three spectrometers of high resolution that simultaneously take measurements of sunlight reflected in the near-infrared CO2 region close to 1.61 and 2.06 μm, in addition to atmospheric molecular oxygen (O2) at 0.76 μm (A-Band).
Above ground biomass
Above ground biomass (AGB) is a crucial metric for evaluating the impact of forest fires. The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts consistently monitors climate change parameters to meet the requirements of the global scientific community (Santoro and Cartus 2021). We processed the global datasets of forest above ground biomass provided by the Climate Change Initiative (https://climate.esa.int/en/about-us-new/climate-change-initiative/) for the year 2020. These datasets were subsetted to focus on our study area, and we conducted pixel-wise multivariate regression analysis to estimate the loss of above ground biomass caused by forest fires in Uttarakhand. The entire dataset was processed using a train-test algorithm, with a split of 70% for training and 30% for testing. The independent variables NDVI, SAVI, and NDI45 were modeled with the AGB data for 2020. The coefficients of these independent variables pre-fire were utilized to obtain the dependent variable (AGB) from the post-fire independent variables.
Results and discussion
Burn severity
In order to track the regrowth of vegetation over burned areas, López Garcia and Caselles (1991) examined LANDSAT-5 thematic mapper data. The thermal band (10.4 to 12.5 μm) and the normalized difference in reflectance between NIR (0.76 to 0.90 μm) and MIR (2.08 to 2.35 μm) were found to be the most appropriate parameters for mapping burned areas. The Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR) is used to determine the location of the burn by measuring the difference in light reflected by burned versus healthy green vegetation. Burned vegetation has a low NBR value, while healthy green vegetation has a high value. NBR values are also lower in areas with bare soil or dry, brown vegetation compared to areas with green vegetation.
Cansler and McKenzie (2012) discovered inconsistent NBR values across ecosystems and proposed two metrics for image-based burn severity: the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR) and the relative differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (RdNBR), with dNBR being slightly superior. However, areas with low pre-fire vegetation cover may face challenges with dNBR due to little absolute change in NBR between pre and post-fire. In such situations, the relativized burn severity is useful. Subtracting a post-fire NBR image from the pre-fire NBR image yields dNBR.
Several studies have been conducted using LANDSAT-8, Sentinel-2, VIIRS, and MODIS datasets to examine the long-term effects (3 to 4 years) of forest fires on the burned area in Uttarakhand (Sannigrahi et al. 2020; Bar et al. 2022). The long-term regeneration of vegetation following a forest fire can affect the accuracy of burn severity measurements. In our study, we examined the effects of a forest fire that started 2 to 3 h before the satellite acquired the image. The NBR was computed using the SWIR Band-12 and NIR Band-8 of Sentinel-2. By using the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR), which measures the absolute difference between pre- and post-fire NBR, we analyzed and classified the burned area of the Almora forest based on the severity of the burn. Equation 5 defines the calculation for NBR, which allows for the categorization of burn severity based on dNBR (Table 2).
According to our analysis, the forests of Almora exhibit burns of varying severity, ranging from 0.27 (moderate–low) to 1.1.51 (High). The presence of numerous longleaf Indian pine in the area, characterized by their combustible needles rich in resin, makes the area susceptible to forest fires. As temperatures increase during the summer season, the forest floor becomes more prone to combustion due to the abundance of pine needles. Detailed analysis of the fire incident on 1 April 2021 revealed that the Almora region in Uttarakhand experienced a severe forest fire, affecting a total area of 478,449.1 ha. The extent and proportion of burn severity in the affected area is presented in Table 3.
The assessment of burn severity in the study area is facilitated by Fig. 2. The bright yellow points indicate areas with high burn severity, characterized by dNBR values > 0.66.
Environmental changes
The forest fire in Almora had a significant impact on the environment and ecology of the Kumaun region in Uttarakhand. These changes were effectively examined through the evaluation of aerosol optical thickness, NDVI, NDMI, and SAVI. Environmental changes within the designated study area were assessed by examining the pixel-wise difference between post-fire and pre-fire images.
Forest fires release substantial amounts of particulate aerosols, which affect air quality and contribute to the radiative forcing of the climate. The characterization of emitted aerosols plays a crucial role in air quality modeling. Soflev et al. (2009) conducted a study utilizing a series of fire events in Europe to evaluate the emissive properties of particulate aerosols by using brightness temperature anomalies and fire radiative power. Ground-based measurements of aerosol concentrations and optical thickness were employed to characterize these events in regions where smoke had a significant influence on fine particle matter concentrations compared to other sources of pollution. Saarnio et al. (2010) analyzed individual smoke plumes from forest fires in Finland and identified submicrometer particles, primarily composed of particulate organic matter, as the main contributor to the increase in particulate matter concentration. Various studies have been conducted on forest fires in Uttarakhand to assess the impact of meteorological factors, carbon stock, forest cover, and climate variability. Due to the limited availability of literary resources in the area, it is crucial to understand the physical and chemical properties of aerosols emitted from smoke plumes generated by fires in the forests of Uttarakhand.
The aerosol optical thickness (AOT) values ranged from 0 to 0.2 pre-fire (16 January 2021) and increased to 0.6 post-fire (1 April 2021). The absolute difference between the pre- and post-fire values indicated an increase in fire-emitted aerosols from 0 to 0.4, raising concerns about local air quality.
The effects of land changes caused by fires have been extensively observed in terms of plant moisture content, soil composition, and vegetation cover. The fire incident that occurred on 1 April 2021 had a significant impact on various forest types found in the state. These include subalpine conifer forests, temperate western Himalayan broadleaf forests, sub-tropical pine forests, and lower Himalayan dry and moist deciduous forests. Among these, the subalpine conifer forests and the dry and moist deciduous forests were the most affected. These forests are categorized as protected areas, highlighting the importance of their preservation.
The subalpine conifer forests exhibited a notable decrease in Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) by 0.4 to 0.9, while the dry and moist deciduous forests showed a decrease in NDVI difference of 0.2 to 0.6. Moreover, the plant moisture content in these forests changed from 0 to 0.3 and 0 to 0.5, in subalpine conifer forest and in dry and moist deciduous forest, respectively. Conversely, the Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) indicated a differential index of soil brightness ranging from 0.1 to 0.5, which reduced uncertainty in NDVI measurements over soil. The impact of forest fires on the area is clearly demonstrated by the decline in green vegetation, plant moisture content, and soil brightness. Figure 3 illustrates the effects of a forest fire on the environment.
Above ground biomass (AGB)
Biomass combustion is a significant consequence of forest fire, as it plays a crucial role in assessing the carbon stock. The examination of burned biomass was conducted using a supervised machine learning approach, specifically by constructing a multivariate linear regression model of above ground biomass (AGB) with the variables of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Normalized Difference Index 45 (NDI45), and Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI). Resampled AGB data, which possessed the same extent and resolution as the NDVI, NDI45, and SAVI data, was processed in the R programming language using the gstat and forecast libraries. The AGB data, along with NDVI, NDI45, and SAVI, was extracted at 25,411,681 points and organized according to a test-train methodology with a split ratio of 70% for testing and 30% for training. In this case, AGB served as the dependent variable while NDVI, NDI45, and SAVI served as the independent variables. The statistical analysis of the model revealed the significance of the relationships between NDVI, NDI45, and SAVI, with r2 = 0.001702 and P < 2.2 10−16. SAVI and NDI45 exhibited negative t-values with respect to AGB, which may be attributed to the random sampling of the population. Nevertheless, the significance of the model and the lower P-value indicated a strong individual relationship with AGB. To further validate the model statistics, an analysis of variance (ANOVA; Fisher 1919) test was conducted. ANOVA partitions the observed aggregate variability within a dataset into two components: systematic factors and random factors. The systematic factors exert a statistical influence on the dataset, whereas the random factors do not. ANOVA (also known as Fisher’s analysis of variance) represents an extension of the t- and Z-tests. Test results demonstrated the significance of the fitted model, as evidenced by the higher F-value for each estimator. The model and ANOVA statistics are presented in Table 4.
After confirming the statistical significance of the model, we applied it to estimate AGB both pre and post-fire. The predicted AGB exhibited a strong positive correlation with NDVI, NDI45, and SAVI both pre and post-fire. Specifically for pre-fire, AGB demonstrated a positive correlation of 0.38 and 0.41, with NDVI and SAVI, respectively. This observation underscores the relationship between green vegetation, moisture in plants, and healthy soil. Conversely, the post-fire correlogram reveals the impact of fire on vegetation, soil, and plant moisture, as evidenced by a decreased positive correlation of 0.24 and 0.20 with NDVI and SAVI, respectively, and a small negative correlation of − 0.19 with NDI45 (Fig. 4).
Significant loss of AGB in the Almora forests is reported during the post-fire event. A pixel-wise comparison of estimated AGB revealed a considerable decrease in biomass across a large area of the Almora Forest Range. Prior to the fire event, most pixels in the region concerned denoted a maximum biomass of 21.03 t ha−1, whereas post-fire, this decreased to 17.38 t ha−1 (Fig. 5).
Effects of forest fire emissions
Forest fires serve as a primary origin for aerosols and greenhouse gases, both of which have significant implications. Biomass burning leads to the generation of black carbon, a particulate pollutant of considerable importance. Within the atmosphere, black carbon absorbs radiation from the sun across all wavelengths, resulting in an increase in near-surface temperature. Conversely, GHGs are responsible for the escalation of near-surface temperature and the phenomenon of global warming. Greenhouse gasses obstruct the passage of reflected long-wave radiation from the Earth’s surface into space, thereby diminishing the rate of cooling and disrupting the planet’s heat budget. In the context of our investigation, the emissions of CO2, CO, CH4, and HCHO during the Almora forest fires are significant parameters. A detailed analysis of the emissions before and after the fire demonstrates a notable decline in air quality.
Forest fires are a prominent contributor to greenhouse gases, particularly through the emission of carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide constitutes the majority of total wildfire smoke emissions, accounting for 90% of carbon emissions, and consequently exerts significant radiative forcing (Urbanski 2014). The global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions in 2019 were equivalent to 59 billion tonnes of CO2, accounting for 75% of total 2019 GHG emissions, with HCHO, NO2, and fluorinated gases contributing methane 18%, 4%, and 2%, respectively (IPCC 2022). Although plants assimilate CO2 in subsequent growing seasons following fire, frequent fires and changing climate conditions may impede the ability of ecosystems to fully recover, resulting in a net increase in CO2 emissions (Bowman et al. 2021).
Numerous researchers have conducted studies on the impact of forest fires on CO2 emissions worldwide. For instance, Rajab et al. (2009) analyzed Atmospheric Infrared Sounder- (AIRS-) retrieved CO2 data over Malaysia and observed heightened CO2 levels during the dry season (February to April), when biomass burning occurs in the region. Mannan et al. (2019) estimated CO2 emissions based on average dry matter g m−2, burned area, combustion factor, and burning efficiency. The severe impact of CO2 on global climate change has prompted the scientific community to develop methodologies for estimating CO2 emissions. Setiani et al. (2021) employed the Google Earth Engine platform to analyze Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 images in Indonesia from 2016 to 2019. Their findings indicated that the events primarily affected grassland and tropical forest areas, as well as a fraction of agricultural areas, with total estimated carbon emissions of 2.5 × 103 t km−2 burned area, with CO2 emissions being the highest, followed by CO emissions. Ndalila et al. (2022) developed a fine-scale emission inventory with spatial patterns of Australian tropical savannas, utilizing fire severity and vegetation mapping alongside favorable emission factors for Australian vegetation types. A comparison of the results with the Global Fire Emission Database for the 2013 Forcett–Dunalley Fire demonstrated the greater reliability of CO2 estimation for Australian fires as compared to fine particulate matter. Lv and Shi (2023) quantified the loss of forest carbon sequestration capacity due to forest fires in China during 2020, estimating the release of 35,017.42 to 98,486.5 t of CO2.
All of these investigations have documented the significance of CO2 emissions, which serve as the primary source for the escalation of temperature and global climate alterations. There have been very few reports that highlight the immediate CO2 emissions from the diverse Uttarakhand forests in terms of ecological classifications. The majority of studies have relied on historical patterns of CO2 to evaluate the repercussions of climate change, with only a small fraction concentrating on event-based analysis. In our study, the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and carbon monoxide (CO) were observed in two homogeneous clusters of forest zones, namely temperate broadleaf forests and moist and dry deciduous forests. It was observed that there was an increase in CO2 by 0.8 × 104 kg C h−1 post-fire in temperate broadleaf forests, which is a cause for concern in terms of climatic instability if the frequency of fire events continues to rise.
Carbon monoxide (CO) is another crucial element of trace gases that indirectly contributes to climate forcing. CO has a substantial impact on the hydroxyl radical concentrations in the troposphere, which in turn affects the duration of greenhouse gases like methane and halocarbons in the atmosphere (Ossola et al. 2022). CO can be generated through the photodegradation of dissolved organic matter, among other sources. Numerous effects of atmospheric CO have been documented, including the formation of ozone and other atmospheric particles. It has been determined that CO has detrimental effects on human health by reducing blood oxygen levels, thus impeding the organs’ ability to receive oxygen. Consequently, the most common side effects of CO exposure are fatigue, headaches, disorientation, and dizziness, all of which are caused by insufficient oxygen delivery to the brain. Olivier et al. (2005) conducted a study on the global trends of GHGs and their precursors through source characterization and revealed that CO resulting from forest fires accounts for half of the global annual CO emissions (~ 300 million tonnes). The primary source of CO emissions from forest fires is the incomplete combustion of biomass. Bela et al. (2022) employed the University of Colorado Airborne Solar Occultation Flux (CU AirSOF) method in conjunction with high-resolution vegetation and fuel datasets from the Biomass Burning Flux Measurements of Trace Gases and Aerosols (BB-FLUX) campaign to measure direct CO emissions from fire plumes during California forest fires. They reported the CO emissions factors based on various vegetation and forest types. In our study, a comparison of temperate broadleaf forests to moist and dry deciduous forests following fire revealed a greater fraction of CO and an increased columnar CO concentration (~ 2000 × 1015 molecules cm−2; Fig. 6). Similar discrepancies in CO emissions have also been reported in terms of emissions factors and fuel consumption for different ecosystems (Campbell et al. 2007; Akagi et al. 2011; van Leeuwen et al. 2014). Methane (CH4), a critical greenhouse gas, is responsible for approximately 20% of the warming caused by long-lived gases. According to the IPCC 2013 report, escalating methane emissions are a significant contributor to the rising concentration of greenhouse gases in the Earth’s atmosphere, and account for up to one-third of near-term global heating. Methane causes direct radiative forcing, which is second only to that of carbon dioxide (Butler et al. 2020).
Due to photochemically induced reactions with oxygen compounds, methane (CH4) can lead to the escalation of shorter-lived ozone and water vapor in the atmosphere. This amplification of methane’s warming influence in the near-term is referred to as indirect radiative forcing. Consequently, the interactions also generate longer-lived and less potent carbon dioxide (CO2). Considering both direct and indirect radiative forcing, the rise in atmospheric methane accounts for approximately one-third of the global heating in the short term. Numerous inquiries have been conducted to incorporate the impact of forest fires on greenhouse gas emissions. Through the utilization of remote sensing and observational techniques, the majority of studies (van der Werf et al. 2010; Shan et al. 2020; Kelly et al. 2021) have examined burned areas, revealing that methane hydrates and soil carbon fluxes are the primary sources of CH4 emissions in wildfire-prone regions.
Our study identifies two clusters of heightened (dry air mole fraction ~ 200 × 10−9 ppbv) methane concentrations within temperate broadleaf forests in the western Himalaya, with a scarcity of emission points in the moist deciduous forests (Fig. 6C). The temperate broadleaf forests are located in the high-altitude zones of the region, where the elevated CH4 levels may be attributed to the combined effects of fire emissions and the indirect impact of CO. In contrast, the lower regions of the study area, characterized by moist deciduous forests, house isolated wetlands clusters, and dispersed population zones where both natural and human activities, such as agriculture and waste disposal, serve as the primary sources of CH4 emissions.
One of the most prevalent volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted by fires is formaldehyde (HCHO), which plays a significant role as a precursor to oxidants. The emissions of HCHO are influenced by factors such as the type of fuel used, modified combustion efficiency, and overall carbon emissions (Liu et al. 2017). Emissions of HCHO can vary by more than a factor of two across different biomes, including tropical forests, savannas, boreal forests, and temperate forests. HCHO is not only generated through direct emissions but also through the oxidation of VOCs in fire plumes. Alvarado et al. (2020) demonstrated that HCHO enhancements in wildfire plumes persist for several days downwind, as observed using data from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI). HCHO also significantly contributes to the production of peroxy radicals (HO2), which in turn affects the formation of ozone and other secondary pollutants. In our study, it was observed that the production of columnar HCHO increased (~ 3500 × 1013 molecules cm−2) in the temperate broadleaf forest zones compared to the moist deciduous forest zones during post-fire events (Fig. 6D). This difference in HCHO production is a consequence of differing combustion efficiencies between the two ecosystems. Uttarakhand has documented a rising occurrence of forest fire events, which have adverse effects on the ecology, wildlife habitats, carbon stock, and regional air quality.
Emissions have the capacity to affect radiation budgets on both regional and global scales, as well as affect the properties of clouds and the water cycle. Aerosols produced by the combustion of forests escape from the boundary layer of the atmosphere and have the potential to remain suspended in the air for many days. These aerosols can modify the regional radiation budget and persist beyond the duration of the fire, leading to a degradation in air quality that can extend for hundreds of kilometers in the downwind direction.
Conclusion
We propose a comprehensive operational framework for the management of natural resources in India through the current work. As far as our knowledge goes, the operational services in India, provided by various agencies, are currently limited to the reporting of active fire points identified in MODIS and VIIRS data. MODIS provides the total count of fire points observed within the last 24 h. In our study, we have evaluated the ecological and climatic impacts of forest fires and have ultimately determined that anthropogenic factors exert the strongest influence on the local and regional climate of Uttarakhand. Utilizing a supervised machine learning algorithm, we quantified the loss of above ground biomass resulting from severe fire events in Uttarakhand and have reported a biomass stock loss of up to 17.55 tonnes per hectare within the study area. We also investigated the immediate emissions resulting from these fire events in order to assess their contribution to greenhouse gases (GHGs), trace gases, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Our findings reveal that fire events have significantly contributed to increased emissions of CO2, CH4, CO, and HCHO. These emitted species are highly concerning pollutants on a global scale, with both direct and indirect effects on global warming and climate change. Our results demonstrated that the temperate broadleaf forests and moist deciduous forests have emitted GHGs and trace gases that contributed to local climatic imbalances. These forests are home to a diverse range of endangered species, many of which are highly endemic, and fire incidents such as these have a detrimental impact on the ecological stability of the region.
Furthermore, our analysis also examined the gaps in biomass estimation and emissions in the Kumaun forests of Uttarakhand. We have shown that the near real-time estimation of biomass and carbon loss resulting from forest fire events can be efficiently achieved by applying a machine learning framework to the most current of satellite images. However, more accurate fine-scale analyses require improved data on fuel types and their corresponding emission factors in the Kumaun forests. Numerous research endeavors are currently underway to detect forest fire incidents at an early stage, and remote sensing algorithms have proven to be particularly effective in monitoring forests. The methodology presented in our paper will contribute to ongoing research efforts related to active fire monitoring and impact assessment, both in India and globally.
Availability of data and materials
Supporting data for this study are available from the authors upon reasonable request.
References
Aaltonen, H., M. Palviainen, X. Zhou, E. Köster, F. Berninger, J. Pumpanen, and K. Köster. 2019. Temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition after forest fire in Canadian permafrost region. Journal of Environmental Management 241:637–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.130.
Agus, R. I., C. Ahmad, K. Faricha, B. Hafidz, A. Dwiki, and C. B. Kannardi Aji. 2020. Understanding forest fire management in Indonesia from a global perspective. ASEAN Journal on Science and Technology for Development 37 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.29037/ajstd.593.
Akagi, S. K., R. J. Yokelson, C. Wiedinmyer, M. J. Alvarado, J. S. Reid, T. Karl, J. D. Crounse, and P. O. Wennberg. 2011. Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 11 (9): 4039–4072. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011.
Alvarado, L. M. A., A. Richter, M. Vrekoussis, A. Hilboll, A. B. Kalisz Hedegaard, O. Schneising, and J. P. Burrows. 2020. Unexpected long-range transport of glyoxal and formaldehyde observed from the Copernicus Sentinel-5 Precursor satellite during the 2018 Canadian wildfires. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 20 (4): 2057–2072. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2057-2020.
Amiro, B. D., J. M. Chen, and J. Liu. 2000. Net primary productivity following forest fire for Canadian ecoregions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30 (6): 939–947. https://doi.org/10.1139/x00-025.
Amiro, B. D., J. B. Todd, B. M. Wotton, K. A. Logan, M. D. Flannigan, B. J. Stocks, J. A. Mason, D. L. Martell, and K. G. Hirsch. 2001. Direct carbon emissions from Canadian forest fires, 1959–1999. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31 (3): 512–525. https://doi.org/10.1139/x00-197.
Bae, M. S., M. J. Skiles, A. M. Lai, M. R. Olson, B. de Foy, and J. J. Schauer. 2019. Assessment of forest fire impacts on carbonaceous aerosols using complementary molecular marker receptor models at two urban locations in California’s San Joaquin Valley. Environmental Pollution 246:274–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.013.
Bar, S., B. R. Parida, A. C. Pandey, and N. Kumar. 2022. Pixel-based long-term (2001–2020) estimations of forest fire emissions over the Himalaya. Remote Sensing 14 (21): 5302. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14215302.
Bela, M. M., N. Kille, S. A. McKeen, J. Romero-Alvarez, R. Ahmadov, E. James, G. Pereira, C. Schmidt, R. B. Pierce, S. M. O’Neill, X. Zhang, S. Kondragunta, C. Wiedinmyer, and R. Volkamer. 2022. Quantifying carbon monoxide emissions on the scale of large wildfires. Geophysical Research Letters 49 (3): e2021GL095831. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095831.
Berenguer, E., G. D. Lennox, J. Ferreira, Y. Malhi, L. E. O. C. Aragão, J. R. Barreto, F. del Bon Espírito-Santo, A. E. S. Figueiredo, F. França, T. A. Gardner, C. A. Joly, A. F. Palmeira, C. A. Quesada, L. C. Rossi, M. M. M. de Seixas, C. C. Smith, K. Withey, and J. Barlow. 2021. Tracking the impacts of El Niño drought and fire in human-modified Amazonian forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118 (30): e2019377118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2019377118.
Bowman, D. M. J. S., G. J. Williamson, O. F. Price, M. N. Ndalila, and R. A. Bradstock. 2021. Australian forests, megafires and the risk of dwindling carbon stocks. Plant Cell and Environment 44 (2): 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13916.
Butler, M. P., T. Lauvaux, S. Feng, J. Liu, K. W. Bowman, and K. J. Davis. 2020. Atmospheric simulations of total column CO2 mole fractions from global to mesoscale within the carbon monitoring system flux inversion framework. Atmosphere 11 (8): 787. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11080787.
Campbell, J., D. Donato, D. Azuma, and B. Law. 2007. Pyrogenic carbon emission from a large wildfire in Oregon, United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 112 (4): G04014. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000451.
Cansler, C. A., and D. McKenzie. 2012. How robust are burn severity indices when applied in a new region? Evaluation of alternate field-based and remote-sensing methods. Remote Sensing 4 (2): 456–483. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4020456.
Cerdà, A. 1998. The influence of aspect and vegetation on seasonal changes in erosion under rainfall simulation on a clay soil in Spain. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 78 (2): 321–330. https://doi.org/10.4141/S97-060.
Datta, R. 2021. To extinguish or not to extinguish: The role of forest fire in nature and soil resilience. Journal of King Saud University - Science 33 (6): 101539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101539.
Delegido, J., J. Verrelst, L. Alonso, and J. Moreno. 2011. Evaluation of Sentinel-2 red-edge bands for empirical estimation of green LAI and chlorophyll content. Sensors 11 (7): 7063–7081. https://doi.org/10.3390/s110707063.
dos Reis, M., P. M. L. de Alencastro Graça, A. M. Yanai, C. J. P. Ramos, and P. M. Fearnside. 2021. Forest fires and deforestation in the central Amazon: Effects of landscape and climate on spatial and temporal dynamics. Journal of Environmental Management 288:112310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112310.
Fisher, R. A. 1919. XV.–The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 52 (2): 399–433. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080456800012163.
Forest Survey of India. 2015. India state of forest report. Dehradun: Forest Survey of India, Ministry of Environment & Forests. https://fsi.nic.in/forest-report-2015
Gao, B. C. 1996. NDWI–a normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sensing of Environment 58 (3): 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00067-3.
Ghorbanzadeh, O., T. Blaschke, K. Gholamnia, and J. Aryal. 2019. Forest fire susceptibility and risk mapping using social/infrastructural vulnerability and environmental variables. Fire 2 (3): 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire2030050.
Gitelson, A. A., A. Viña, S. B. Verma, D. C. Rundquist, T. J. Arkebauer, G. Keydan, B. Leavitt, V. Ciganda, G. G. Burba, and A. E. Suyker. 2006. Relationship between gross primary production and chlorophyll content in crops: implications for the synoptic monitoring of vegetation productivity. Journal of Geophysical Research 111 (D8): D08S11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006017.
Emissions, E. U. E. E. A. E. T. C. on A., Grösslinger, E., Grosslinger, E., Radunsky, K., Ritter, M., Eggleston, S., EEA, and E. E. Agency. 1996. Corinair 1990 Summary Report 1. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=mFty0AEACAAJ
Haywood, J. M., V. Ramaswamy, and B. J. Soden. 1999. Tropospheric aerosol climate forcing in clear-sky satellite observations over the oceans. Science 283 (5406): 1299–1303. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5406.1299.
Heyer, J. P., M. J. Power, R. D. Field, and M. J. E. van Marle. 2018. The impacts of recent drought on fire, forest loss, and regional smoke emissions in lowland Bolivia. Biogeosciences 15 (14): 4317–4331. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-4317-2018.
Huete, A. R. 1988. A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sensing of Environment 25 (3): 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-X.
IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]. 2022. Climate change 2022: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In Summary for policymakers, ed. P. R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, M. Belkacemi, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, and J. Malley. Cambridge, and New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926.001.
Jang, E., Y. Kang, J. Im, D. W. Lee, J. Yoon, and S. K. Kim. 2019. Detection and monitoring of forest fires using Himawari-8 geostationary satellite data in South Korea. Remote Sensing 11 (3): 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11030271.
Kelly, J., T. S. Ibáñez, C. Santín, S. H. Doerr, M. C. Nilsson, T. Holst, A. Lindroth, and N. Kljun. 2021. Boreal forest soil carbon fluxes one year after a wildfire: Effects of burn severity and management. Global Change Biology 27 (17): 4181–4195. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15721.
Kirchmeier-Young, M. C., N. P. Gillett, F. W. Zwiers, A. J. Cannon, and F. S. Anslow. 2019. Attribution of the influence of human-induced climate change on an extreme fire season. Earth’s Future 7 (1): 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001050.
Kolanek, A., M. Szymanowski, and A. Raczyk. 2021. Human activity affects forest fires: The impact of anthropogenic factors on the density of forest fires in Poland. Forests 12 (6): 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060728.
Lazaridis, M., M. Latos, V. Aleksandropoulou, O. Hov, A. Papayannis, and K. Tørseth. 2008. Contribution of forest fire emissions to atmospheric pollution in Greece. Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health 1 (3): 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-008-0020-0.
Liu, C., Z. Ma, Y. Mu, J. Liu, C. Zhang, Y. Zhang, P. Liu, and H. Zhang. 2017. The levels, variation characteristics, and sources of atmospheric non-methane hydrocarbon compounds during wintertime in Beijing. China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 17 (17): 10633–10649. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10633-2017.
López García, M. J., and V. Caselles. 1991. Mapping burns and natural reforestation using thematic Mapper data. Geocarto International 6 (1): 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049109354290.
Lv, H., and A. Shi. (2023). Setting the Forestry Carbon Sink Insurance compensation standard for reducing losses from forest fires: an empirical study estimating CO2 emissions from forest fires in a sample of 15 provinces. Frontiers in Environmental Science 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1112525
Ma, W., Z. Feng, Z. Cheng, S. Chen, and F. Wang. 2020. Identifying forest fire driving factors and related impacts in China using random forest algorithm. Forests 11 (5): 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11050507.
Mannan, A., Z. Feng, A. Ahmad, M. Beckline, S. Saeed, J. Liu, S. Shah, M. Amir, U. Ammara, and T. Ullah. 2019. CO2 emission trends and risk zone mapping of forest fires in subtropical and moist temperate forests of Pakistan. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 17 (2): 2983–3002. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1702_29833002.
Mohajane, M., R. Costache, F. Karimi, Q. Bao Pham, A. Essahlaoui, H. Nguyen, G. Laneve, and F. Oudija. 2021. Application of remote sensing and machine learning algorithms for forest fire mapping in a Mediterranean area. Ecological Indicators 129:107869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107869.
Ndalila, M. N., G. J. Williamson, and D. M. J. S. Bowman. 2022. Carbon dioxide and particulate emissions from the 2013 Tasmanian firestorm: Implications for Australian carbon accounting. Carbon Balance and Management 17 (1): 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-022-00207-9.
Nojarov, P., and M. Nikolova. 2022. Heat waves and forest fires in Bulgaria. Natural Hazards 114 (2): 1897–1899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05451-3.
Noyes, K. J., R. Kahn, A. Sedlacek, L. Kleinman, J. Limbacher, and Z. Li. 2020. Wildfire smoke particle properties and evolution, from space-based multi-angle imaging. Remote Sensing 12 (5): 769. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12050769.
Olivier, J. G. J., J. A. Van Aardenne, F. J. Dentener, V. Pagliari, L. N. Ganzeveld, and J. A. Peters. 2005. Recent trends in global greenhouse gas emissions: Regional trends 1970–2000 and spatial distribution of key sources in 2000. Environmental Sciences 2 (2–3): 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/15693430500400345.
Ossola, R., R. Gruseck, J. Houska, A. Manfrin, M. Vallieres, and k. McNeill. 2022. Photochemical production of carbon monoxide from dissolved organic matter: Role of lignin methoxyarene functional groups. Environmental Science and Technology 56 (18): 13449–13460. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c03762.
Pellegrini, A. F. A., A. Ahlström, S. E. Hobbie, P. B. Reich, L. P. Nieradzik, A. C. Staver, B. C. Scharenbroch, A. Jumpponen, W. R. L. Anderegg, J. T. Randerson, and R. B. Jackson. 2018. Fire frequency drives decadal changes in soil carbon and nitrogen and ecosystem productivity. Nature 553:194–198. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24668.
Pérez-Cabello, F., A. Cerdà, J. de la Riva, M. T. Echeverría, A. García-Martín, P. Ibarra, T. Lasanta, R. Montorio, and V. Palacios. 2012. Micro-scale post-fire surface cover changes monitored using high spatial resolution photography in a semiarid environment: A useful tool in the study of post-fire soil erosion processes. Journal of Arid Environments 76 (1): 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.08.007.
R Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Rabiei, J., M. S. Khademi, S. Bagherpour, N. Ebadi, A. Karimi, and K. Ostad-Ali-Askari. 2022. Investigation of fire risk zones using heat-humidity time series data and vegetation. Applied Water Science 12 (9): 216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01742-z.
Rajab, J. M., M. Z. MatJafri, H. S. Lim, and K. Abdullah. 2009. Satellite mapping of CO2 emission from forest fires in Indonesia using AIRS measurements. Modern Applied Science 3 (12): 68–75. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v3n12p68.
Rouse, J. W, R. H. Haas, J. A. Scheel, and D. W. Deering. (1974). Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. Pages 309–317 in: S.C. Frede, E.P Mercanti, and M.A. Becker, compilers and editors. Proceedings of the Third Earth Resources Technology Satellite-1 Symposium. Volume 1: Technical Presentations, section A. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 10–14 December 1973, Washington, D.C., USA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19740022614
Saarnio, K., M. Aurela, H. Timonen, S. Saarikoski, K. Teinilä, T. Mäkelä, M. Sofiev, J. Koskinen, P. P. Aalto, M. Kulmala, J. Kukkonen, and R. Hillamo. 2010. Chemical composition of fine particles in fresh smoke plumes from boreal wild-land fires in Europe. Science of the Total Environment 408 (12): 2527–2542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.03.010.
Sannigrahi, S., F. Pilla, B. Basu, A. S. Basu, K. Sarkar, S. Chakraborti, P. K. Joshi, Q. Zhang, Y. Wang, S. Bhatt, A. Bhatt, S. Jha, S. Keesstra, and P. S. Roy. 2020. Examining the effects of forest fire on terrestrial carbon emission and ecosystem production in India using remote sensing approaches. Science of the Total Environment 725:138331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138331.
Santoro, M., and O. Cartus. (2021). ESA Biomass Climate Change Initiative (Biomass_cci): Global datasets of forest above-ground biomass for the years 2010, 2017 and 2018, v3. NERC EDS Centre for Environmental Data Analysis, 26 November 2021. https://doi.org/10.5285/5f331c418e9f4935b8eb1b836f8a91b8
Setiani, P., L. A. Devianto, and F. Ramdani. 2021. Rapid estimation of CO2 emissions from forest fire events using cloud-based computation of google earth engine. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 193 (10): 669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09460-w.
Shan, W., Z. Xu, Y. Guo, C. Zhang, Z. Hu, and Y. Wang. 2020. Geological methane emissions and wildfire risk in the degraded permafrost area of the Xiao Xing’an Mountains. China. Scientific Reports 10 (1): 21297. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78170-z.
Sharifi, E. 2022. The role of wildfires in a sustainable future. Journal of Future Sustainability 2 (1): 17–21. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.jfs.2022.8.003.
Sharma, S., and H. Pant. 2017. Vulnerability of Indian Central Himalayan forests to fire in a warming climate and a participatory preparedness approach based on modern tools. Current Science 112 (10): 2100–2105 http://www.jstor.org/stable/26163950.
Sofiev, M., R. Vankevich, M. Lotjonen, M. Prank, V. Petukhov, T. Ermakova, J. Koskinen, and J. Kukkonen. 2009. An operational system for the assimilation of the satellite information on wild-land fires for the needs of air quality modelling and forecasting. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 9 (18): 6833–6847. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6833-2009.
Taylor, A. R., M. Seedre, B. W. Brassard, and H. Y. H. Chen. 2014. Decline in net ecosystem productivity following canopy transition to late-succession forests. Ecosystems 17 (5): 778–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-014-9759-3.
Turco, M., J. T. Abatzoglou, S. Herrera, Y. Zhuang, S. Jerez, D. D. Lucas, A. AghaKouchak, and I. Cvijanovic. 2023. Anthropogenic climate change impacts exacerbate summer forest fires in California. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 120 (25): e2213815120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2213815120.
Urbanski, S. 2014. Wildland fire emissions, carbon, and climate: Emission factors. Forest Ecology and Management 317:51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.045.
van der Werf, G. R., J. T. Randerson, L. Giglio, G. J. Collatz, M. Mu, P. S. Kasibhatla, D. C. Morton, R. S. Defries, Y. Jin, and T. T. van Leeuwen. 2010. Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997–2009). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 10 (23): 11707–11735. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010.
Van Hoang, T., T. Y. Chou, Y. M. Fang, N. T. Nguyen, Q. H. Nguyen, and P. Xuan CanhD. Ngo Bao Toan, X. L. Nguyen, and M. E. Meadows. 2020. Mapping forest fire risk and development of early warning system for NW Vietnam using AHP and MCA/GIS methods. Applied Sciences 10 (12): 4348. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124348.
van Leeuwen, T. T., G. R. van der Werf, A. A. Hoffmann, R. G. Detmers, G. Rücker, N. H. F. French, S. Archibald, J. A. Carvalho Jr., G. D. Cook, W. J. de Groot, C. Hély, E. S. Kasischke, S. Kloster, J. L. McCarty, M. L. Pettinari, P. Savadogo, E. C. Alvarado, L. Boschetti, S. Manuri, C. P. Meyer, F. Siegert, L. A. Trollope, and W. S. W. Trollope. 2014. Biomass burning fuel consumption rates: A field measurement database. Biogeosciences 11 (24): 7305–7329. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-7305-2014.
Versini, P. A., M. Velasco, A. Cabello, and D. Sempere-Torres. 2013. Hydrological impact of forest fires and climate change in a Mediterranean basin. Natural Hazards 66 (2): 609–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0503-z.
Wang, J., and X. Zhang. 2020. Investigation of wildfire impacts on land surface phenology from MODIS time series in the western US forests. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 159:281–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.11.027.
Wang, W., Q. Zhang, J. Luo, R. Zhao, and Y. Zhang. 2020. Estimation of forest fire emissions in southwest China from 2013 to 2017. Atmosphere 11 (1): 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11010015.
Wilhelm, W. W., K. Ruwe, and M. R. Schlemmer. 2000. Comparison of three leaf area index meters in a corn canopy. Crop Science 40 (4): 1179–1183. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.4041179x.
Yin, S., X. Wang, X. Zhang, M. Guo, M. Miura, and Y. Xiao. 2019. Influence of biomass burning on local air pollution in mainland Southeast Asia from 2001 to 2016. Environmental Pollution 254 (Part A): 112949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.07.117.
Zheng, Z., Y. Zeng, S. Li, and W. Huang. 2016. A new burn severity index based on land surface temperature and enhanced vegetation index. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 45 (Part A): 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2015.11.002.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Director General of Meteorology, India Meteorological Department, New Delhi, India, and Christ University, Lavasa Campus, Pune, India for providing the opportunity to conduct this research work. The authors also thank the European Space Agency, Climate Change Initiative, and Global Gridded Daily CO2 Emissions Dataset for providing LULC, Sentinel-2, Sentinel-5p, and CO2 data.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.T. was responsible for conceptualization, data collection, data analyses, visualization, and writing. P. N. contributed editing, and supervision. R.R.K. helped with data analyses and visualization. V.K.S. provided editing and supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval and consent to participate.
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
The authors agree to the publication of this study without restriction.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tiwari, A., Nanjundan, P., Kumar, R.R. et al. A framework for natural resource management with geospatial machine learning: a case study of the 2021 Almora forest fires. fire ecol 20, 78 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-024-00293-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-024-00293-9