- Original research
- Open access
- Published:
Effects of fire and fire-induced changes in soil properties on post-burn soil respiration
Fire Ecology volume 20, Article number: 90 (2024)
Abstract
Background
Boreal forests cover vast areas of land in the northern hemisphere and store large amounts of carbon (C) both aboveground and belowground. Wildfires, which are a primary ecosystem disturbance of boreal forests, affect soil C via combustion and transformation of organic matter during the fire itself and via changes in plant growth and microbial activity post-fire. Wildfire regimes in many areas of the boreal forests of North America are shifting towards more frequent and severe fires driven by changing climate. As wildfire regimes shift and the effects of fire on belowground microbial community composition are becoming clearer, there is a need to link fire-induced changes in soil properties to changes in microbial functions, such as respiration, in order to better predict the impact of future fires on C cycling.
Results
We used laboratory burns to simulate boreal crown fires on both organic-rich and sandy soil cores collected from Wood Buffalo National Park, Alberta, Canada, to measure the effects of burning on soil properties including pH, total C, and total nitrogen (N). We used 70-day soil incubations and two-pool exponential decay models to characterize the impacts of burning and its resulting changes in soil properties on soil respiration. Laboratory burns successfully captured a range of soil temperatures that were realistic for natural wildfire events. We found that burning increased pH and caused small decreases in C:N in organic soil. Overall, respiration per gram total (post-burn) C in burned soil cores was 16% lower than in corresponding unburned control cores, indicating that soil C lost during a burn may be partially offset by burn-induced decreases in respiration rates. Simultaneously, burning altered how remaining C cycled, causing an increase in the proportion of C represented in the modeled slow-cycling vs. fast-cycling C pool as well as an increase in fast-cycling C decomposition rates.
Conclusions
Together, our findings imply that C storage in boreal forests following wildfires will be driven by the combination of C losses during the fire itself as well as fire-induced changes to the soil C pool that modulate post-fire respiration rates. Moving forward, we will pair these results with soil microbial community data to understand how fire-induced changes in microbial community composition may influence respiration.
Resumen
Antecedentes
Los bosques boreales cubren vastas áreas de tierras en el Hemisferio Norte y almacenan grandes cantidades de Carbono (C), tanto en sus estructuras aéreas como subterráneas. Los incendios, que representan el disturbio ecosistémico primario en los bosques boreales, afectan el C del suelo vía combustión y transformación de la Materia Orgánica (MO) durante el mismo incendio, y vía cambios en el crecimiento de las plantas y actividad microbiana en el post fuego. Los regímenes de fuegos de vegetación en muchas áreas de bosques boreales de América del Norte están cambiando hacia incendios más frecuentes y severos, conducidos por el Cambio Climático. A medida que los regímenes de incendios cambian y los efectos del fuego sobre la composición de las comunidades microbianas se van aclarando, hay una necesidad de ligar los cambios inducidos por el fuego en las propiedades del suelo con cambios en las funciones de los microbios, como en la respiración, de manera de predecir mejor el impacto de fuegos futuros sobre el ciclo del C.
Resultados
Usamos quemas en el laboratorio para simular fuegos de copas de bosques boreales sobre muestras cilíndricas (soil cores) de suelos ricos en MO y arenosos colectados del sitio Wood Buffalo National Park, en Alberta, Canada, para medir los efectos de la quema sobre algunas propiedades de los suelos incluyendo pH, Carbono total (C) y nitrógeno total (N). Usamos incubaciones de esas muestras de suelo por 70 días y modelos de descomposición con dos reservas de C para caracterizar los impactos de la quema y los cambios resultantes en cuanto a propiedades y respiración del suelo. Las quemas de laboratorio capturaron exitosamente un rango de temperaturas de suelo que fueron realistas para eventos de fuegos naturales. Encontramos que las quemas incrementaron el pH y causaron pequeñas disminuciones en la relación C:N en el suelo orgánico. En general, la respiración total por g de C en el post fuego en las muestras quemadas fue un 16% menor que en las muestras no quemadas, indicando que el C perdido durante la quema puede ser parcialmente compensado por decrecimientos en la respiración inducida por la propia quema. Simultáneamente, la quema alteró el cuánto C remanente se reciclaba, causando un incremento en la proporción de C representado en la reserva de C ciclo-lento vs ciclo-rápido en el modelo, como así también un incremento, en el caso del ciclo rápido, en su tasa de descomposición.
Conclusiones
En conjunto, nuestros resultados implican que el almacenamiento de C en bosques boreales va a ser conducido por la combinación de pérdidas de C durante el mismo fuego como así también por cambios inducidos por el fuego en la reserva de C del suelo moduladas por las tasas de respiración en el post fuego. Hacia el futuro, aparearemos estos resultados con datos de la comunidad microbiótica del suelo para entender cómo los cambios inducidos por el fuego en la comunidad microbiana pueden influenciar la respiración.
Introduction
Boreal forests cover 18.9 million km2 in the northern hemisphere (Brandt et al. 2013) and store vast amounts of carbon (C) above- and belowground (Bradshaw and Warkentin 2015), making them an important global reservoir of C. The boreal zone is classified as the area of land at high northern latitudes that circumnavigates the Arctic and contains forests of cold-tolerant plant species and alpine areas (Brandt et al. 2013). Long, cold winters and short, cool summers lead to low rates of decomposition, supporting C accumulation (DeLuca and Boisvenue 2012). These C stores are affected by fire; both wildfire and prescribed fire used as a land management tool by indigenous groups have been an integral part of the boreal forests of Canada and Alaska for hundreds to thousands of years (MacDonald et al. 1991; Prince et al. 2018; Christianson et al. 2022). Understanding the impacts of wildfire on soil C stores over time is particularly important for predicting how the ecosystem services of boreal forests will change under future climate regimes.
During a wildfire, above- and belowground organic matter (OM) can volatilize and combust, resulting in large C and nitrogen (N) emissions from the burned area—an estimated 51 Tg C year−1 was emitted during wildfires in the boreal forest of North America between 1997 and 2016 (Zhao et al. 2021). Combustion of the soil organic horizon is a large contributor to these C emissions. For example, soil C losses of 3.0 kg C m−2 were observed following a large wildfire in the boreal forest of the Northwestern Territories, Canada (Walker et al. 2018). In another study, 2.3 kg C m−2 was lost from the O horizon and mineral soil of a Douglas-fir forest during a wildfire in southwestern Oregon, USA (Bormann et al. 2008). However, the impacts of wildfire on boreal forest soil C stocks extend beyond loss of C during the wildfire itself. Fire also has immediate effects on soil properties, plant communities, and microbial community composition, with long-term consequences for C cycling. Previous work using two-pool exponential decay models showed a decrease in size (as a fraction of total) of fast-cycling C pools and a corresponding increase in decay rates of this pool following burning (Johnson et al. 2023), suggesting that fire-induced changes to the soil environment impact the cycling of the C that remains post-fire.
Changes to the soil environment during a wildfire are often driven by many factors, including the temperatures experienced at the soil surface. Temperatures at the soil surface during a crown fire can reach hundreds of degrees Celsius (DeBano 1991; Neary et al. 1999). High temperatures can drive heat-induced denaturation of organic acids and the creation of base cation-rich ash, causing an increase in soil pH, which can persist for years following fire (Certini 2005; Úbeda et al. 2005). Understanding the effects of wildfires on soil pH in both the short- and long-term is particularly important for predicting soil C cycling, as pH can influence bacterial community composition (Lauber et al. 2009; Rousk et al. 2010). We previously found an average pH increase of 2.7 units following burning of sandy acidic soil samples and organic-rich soil samples from the boreal forest (Johnson et al. 2023). However, the relationship between fire and soil pH is not straightforward. Under conditions of soil heating at moderate temperatures, pH has also been observed to decrease, which may be due to the volatilization and downward movement of organic acids from overlying horizons that then condense upon reaching the cooler underlying soil (Luo 2023). Additional research is needed to untangle the relationship between heat-induced changes in soil pH and post-fire soil C cycling.
Another way in which immediate effects of wildfire may influence longer-term soil C pools is via the incomplete combustion of OM and resulting creation of pyrogenic OM (Knicker 2011). Pyrogenic OM is characterized by polycyclic aromatic structures that lend it biological and chemical stability (Ohlson et al. 2009), generally reducing its bioavailability for microbes. Previously, we found that changes in C composition and related changes in degradation rates played a large role in driving depressed post-burn soil respiration rates (Johnson et al. 2023). Therefore, it is possible that burn conditions that favor pyrogenic OM production may have larger impacts on respiration rates (normalized by total remaining C) than burn conditions that cause more complete combustion of OM.
Partial or complete combustion of soil surface horizons and associated OM also kills microbes, immediately altering microbial community composition (Johnson et al. 2023, Certini et al. 2021). Heat-induced changes to soil properties such as those detailed above continue to affect soil microbial community composition months to years following fire, with potential consequences for C mineralization. For example, in a meta-analysis of microbial biomass following prescribed fires and wildfires, Dooley and Treseder (2012) documented a correlation between decreased microbial biomass and decreased soil respiration in boreal forest soils following wildfire. However, previously, we concluded that soil C mineralization rates are likely not constrained by loss of potential functions within microbial communities—i.e., after burning, microbial communities could still readily degrade OM (Johnson et al. 2023). However, this previous study used homogenized soil subsamples to measure soil respiration, thereby obscuring any constraints of spatial accessibility of C to soil microbes.
In addition, burn-induced effects on soil properties are also influenced by fire intensity. This is increasingly important, given our new awareness of changing boreal forest wildfire regimes driven by climate change. Here we follow Keeley et al. (2009), using “fire intensity” to denote heat dosage and “fire severity” to mean ecosystem response, specifically loss of above- and belowground organic matter. Wildfire regimes in the North American boreal forest are currently undergoing a shift towards more severe fires (Flannigan et al. 2000; Kasischke and Turetsky 2006; De Groot et al. 2013) as well as larger and more numerous fires (Natural Resources Canada 2019). With climate change and increasing temperatures at northern latitudes, fire severity is predicted to continue to increase and fire return intervals to shorten in the coming century (Balshi et al. 2009; Flannigan et al. 2009; Hanes et al. 2018), which may have large implications for these ecosystems. Fire severity influences the amount of time required for ecosystem recovery (Holden et al. 2016; Dove et al. 2020), and increasing fire severity in boreal forest ecosystems has been linked to significant decreases in post-burn soil respiration (Holden et al. 2016; Kelly et al. 2021). Understanding the effects of fire of varying severity on soil C cycling across a range of soil types is important for predicting boreal forest carbon fluxes under future climate conditions. Our objectives for this study were to quantify the effects of burning and burn duration on total C, total N, soil pH, and soil CO2 efflux in contrasting soil types typical of the Canadian boreal forest. We used a laboratory mass loss calorimeter to simulate heat exposures characteristic of boreal crown fires on both intact organic-rich and sandy soil cores collected from Wood Buffalo National Park, Alberta, Canada, to evaluate the effects of burning. We conducted 70-day soil incubations and fitted two-pool exponential decay models to respiration data to measure the impact of burning and burn-induced changes to soil properties on soil respiration. Burning and incubating intact soil cores allowed us to account for spatial patterns in combustion and microbial mortality within a soil. This is important because soil temperature during a wildfire rapidly attenuates with depth due to the insulating properties of soil (Beadle 1940), and thus both mass microbial mortality and OM combustion are generally confined to the uppermost soil horizons. We hypothesized that (1) burning would cause an increase in soil pH and a decrease in total soil C and N concentrations, with larger changes following longer burns, (2) pH would decline towards (but not reach) pre-burn levels within months of burning, and (3) soil respiration would decline with burning. In line with previous work, we expected to see a decrease in the fractional size of the fast-cycling C pool and corresponding increase in decay rate with burning, and an increase in the fractional size of the slow-cycling C pool and a corresponding decrease in decay rate with burning.
Methods
Study area
Soil cores were collected from 12 sites across Wood Buffalo National Park, located at the border of Alberta and the Northwest Territories, Canada, over a 5-day period in June 2022 (Fig. 1; Supplementary Table 1). Average annual rainfall for this region is 300–400 mm, and average summer and winter temperatures range from 10 to 22 °C and − 24 to − 14 °C, respectively (Alberta Climate Information Service 2018). Sites representing two dominant vegetation types—jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) and spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) and/or Picea glauca (Moench) Voss)—were randomly selected from areas of forest unburned for greater than 30 years (Beaudoin et al. 2017; Natural Resources Canada 2022). Sites were located between 0.1 and 0.5 km from roads and > 0.5 km from other sampling sites. Upon arriving, we confirmed the dominant tree species. Soils underlying Picea spp.-dominated sites tended to have thick (> 10 cm deep) organic horizons (Supplementary Table 2) consisting of living and dead sphagnum moss and are classified as Dystric Histosols (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2003). Soils underlying Pinus banksiana-dominated sites tended to have thinner (0.5–5 cm thick) O horizons underlain by sandy mineral soil and are classified as Eutric Gleysols (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2003).
Sampling methods
At each site, 16 soil cores 6 cm in diameter and 10 cm in height were collected across a 2 m radius circle using a soil core sampler with clear PETG plastic core liners (Giddings Machine Company, Windsor, CO, USA) (Supplementary Table 1). Cores were labeled and capped with a perforated top cap to prevent development of anoxic conditions. We deconstructed three cores within 8 h of sampling to measure O and mineral horizon thickness, bulk density, and field moisture. All collected soil was transported to Madison, WI, USA, within 10 days of sampling and allowed to air dry in a dark room for 6 weeks to simulate drought conditions (Alberta Climate Information Service 2018). One core from each site was destructively sampled for a soil texture analysis using a physical analysis hydrometer at the UW-Madison Soil and Forage Lab (Madison, WI, USA).
Laboratory burns
To simulate typical fires for this region, four cores from each site were exposed to 60 kW m−2 in a mass loss calorimeter (Fire Testing Technology Limited, West Sussex, UK) for 120 s (Supplementary Fig. 1). We chose this method for delivering the heat dose treatment over others (such as heating in an oven or water bath) to more closely mimic the spatial and temporal heat dose delivery of a natural wildfire. During the heat dose treatment, a spark ignitor located above the top of the core (Supplementary Fig. 1) was used to trigger combustion. Following the treatment, each core was removed from the mass loss calorimeter, allowed to continue smoldering in a fume hood, and left to cool to room temperature. Heat flux and duration were chosen to represent wildland fire propagation (Silvani and Morandini 2009) for a mid- to high-range crown fire (Frankman et al. 2012; Thompson et al. 2015). Another four cores from each site were exposed to the same heat flux for 30 s. This duration was chosen to represent soil partially shielded from a flaming front by debris such as downed logs. Four additional cores from each site were not burned (designated “control” cores).
Beaded 20-gauge Type-K thermocouples (GG-K-20-SLE, Omega) inserted horizontally at the base of the O horizon (or at 5 cm depth in cases where cores consisted of solely O horizon) and 1 cm above the base of the core tracked temperature during the burns and for a minimum of 5 h afterwards. To account for both the duration and degree of heating, we used a weighted measure of the cumulative time above 25 °C, designated “degree hours” (DH). DH were calculated by multiplying the timestep by each temperature data point (minus 25 °C) and summing the result across the portion of the temperature profile (Fig. 2) above 25 °C. Twenty-four hours after the burn, mass loss and the depth of O horizon combustion were recorded. Sets of cores representing the three treatments (120 s burn duration, 30 s burn duration, and unburned control) from each site were incubated together for 48 h, 24 days, 49 days, and 70 days.
Post-burn soil analyses
Water was added to intact soil cores to bring moisture to 65% of field capacity, and cores were immediately placed in 475-mL Mason jars to incubate in the dark at room temperature. The cores were divided into four sets each containing three cores (unburned, 30 s burn, 120 s burn) from each site. The first set was destructively sampled 48 h post-burn and subsamples of O and mineral horizon soil were collected for pH measurements (Braus and Whitman 2021) and C and N analysis (Flash EA 1112 CN Automatic Elemental Analyzer (Thermo Finnigan, Milan, Italy)). The second and third sets of cores were destructively sampled for pH measurements 24 days and 49 days post-burn, respectively. The final set of cores was used to track soil respiration over the course of a 70-day incubation, after which they were also destructively sampled for pH measurements. These cores were placed in 475-mL Mason jars fitted with gas-tight lines connected to an automated sample analyzer (“multiplexer”). The multiplexer automatically samples and quantifies the amount of CO2 in the jar headspace via a Picarro cavity ring-down spectrometer G2201-i (Santa Clara, CA, USA) (Berry et al. 2021). Measurements of headspace CO2 were collected within 3 h of adding water and continued at least once per 24-h period for 70 days. Each measurement consisted of a 5-min period during which the multiplexer continuously sampled headspace gas followed by a 5-min aeration period during which medical grade air was pumped through the gas lines and jar headspace to prevent CO2 accumulation. To maintain soil moisture, soil cores were reweighed after 5 weeks, and water was added to replace mass lost. To characterize microbial C mineralization, we fit two-pool exponential decay models for each sample to this flux data and estimated respiration rate constants and fractional sizes of fast and slow C pools using Eq. 1:
where Mt is the total C pool, M1 and M2 are the fast-cycling and slow-cycling C pools, respectively, k1 and k2 are the respiration rate constants for the fast and slow C pools, respectively, and t is time. This model was fit using the nls.lm function in the minpack.lm package (Elzhov et al. 2016) in R.
Statistical analyses
All analyses were performed using R statistical software version 4.3.1 (R Core Team 2023) and model results plotted using R package ggplot2 (Wickham 2016). We used Wilcoxon signed rank tests to analyze differences in soil temperature during and following the heat dose treatments. We used ANOVA models and Tukey’s HSD to assess the impact of burning and heat dose treatment duration on soil pH, total C, total N, and C:N ratios. We used Kruskal–Wallis and paired Wilcox tests to analyze differences in respiration and decay model coefficients between burned and unburned soil.
Results
The effect of burning on soil temperature varied with soil type and heat dose duration
The two heat dose treatment durations (30 s and 120 s) created a range of soil temperatures and mass losses (Fig. 2; Supplementary Figs. 2–4; Table 1) representative of soil temperatures during a wildfire. All burns produced ash and charred organic matter at the soil surface (Supplementary Fig. 4). Maximum temperatures at 5 cm depth in organic soil cores following the 120 s heat dose treatments (mean = 336.8 ± 197.0 °C) were significantly higher than maximum temperatures following the 30 s heat dose treatments (mean = 109.7 ± 168.7 °C) (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p = 3.7 × 10−5). Maximum temperatures at the base of the O horizon in sandy soil cores following the 120 s heat dose treatments (mean = 163.4 ± 94.7 °C) were significantly higher than maximum temperatures following the 30 s heat dose treatments (mean = 67.2 ± 45.1 °C) (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p = 9.1 × 10−5).
Temperatures at the base of the organic soil cores in 120 s burns reached a maximum of 180.1 °C (mean = 56.9 ± 38.0 °C). Temperatures at the base of the sandy soil cores did not exceed 53.1 °C. All cores returned to room temperature within 6.3 h.
Due to the complex nature of fire and the heterogeneity of intact soil cores, maximum temperatures reached following the heat dose treatment varied greatly between cores both within the same site and across sites (Supplementary Fig. 3).
We recorded significantly higher DH at the upper thermocouple following the 120 s heat dose treatments in both organic (mean = 626.1 ± 435.8 °C \(\cdot\) h) and sandy soil cores (mean = 148.3 ± 86.3 °C \(\cdot\) h) compared to the 30 s heat dose treatments (organic, mean = 172.8 ± 315.1 °C \(\cdot\) h; ANOVA, p = 3.7 × 10−5; sandy, mean = 83.8 ± 44.3 °C \(\cdot\) h; ANOVA, p = 0.002).
Soil pH increases with higher temperatures and longer heat exposures
Burning caused an immediate increase in soil pH (Fig. 3). Following the 120 s heat dose treatment, soil pH was significantly higher in organic soil (mean = 7.7 ± 0.7), sandy soil O horizons (mean = 6.1 ± 1.1), and sandy soil mineral horizons (mean = 5.0 ± 0.5) compared to unburned controls (organic soil, mean = 6.6 ± 0.7; ANOVA, p = 0.01; sandy soil O horizon, mean = 4.6 ± 0.2; ANOVA, p = 0.01; sandy soil mineral horizon, mean = 4.8 ± 0.5; ANOVA, p = 0.03). There was only weak evidence that the 30 s burn duration treatment had a positive effect on soil pH in organic soil (mean = 7.3 ± 0.6; ANOVA, p = 0.1). There was no significant change in pH following the 30 s heat exposure in sandy soil (O horizon, mean = 5.0 ± 0.4; ANOVA, p = 0.6; mineral horizon, mean = 4.9 ± 0.5; ANOVA, p = 0.4). The interaction between site type (organic vs. sandy) and heat dose treatment duration was not significant.
Soil pH was significantly positively correlated with DH (p = 0.01, \({R}_{adj.}^{2}\) = 0.73) in organic and sandy soil (interaction term between site type and soil pH, p = 2.1 × 10−5) (Supplementary Fig. 5).
Soil pH in control cores increased over the course of the 70-day incubation for organic cores (2 days post-burn, mean = 6.6 ± 0.7; 70 days post-burn, mean = 7.8 ± 0.9; ANOVA, p = 0.026) and for the organic horizon of sandy cores (2 days post-burn, mean = 4.6 ± 0.2; 70 days post-burn, mean = 5.3 ± 0.5; ANOVA, p = 0.014). There was no change in pH of mineral horizons of control samples during the incubation. For the burned cores, there was weak evidence of an increase in pH over the course of the incubation only in the organic horizons of sandy cores exposed to the 30 s heat treatment (2 days post-burn, mean = 5.0 ± 0.2; 70 days post-burn, mean = 5.7 ± 0.4; ANOVA, p = 0.05e − 02) (Supplementary Fig. 6).
Soil C:N ratios decrease with burning
Despite losses in total stocks through combustion, burning did not significantly change soil total C or N concentrations relative to unburned soil (Supplementary Table 3; Supplementary Figs. 7 and 8); however, burning did affect C:N ratios. Following the 120 s heat dose treatment, soil C:N ratios were significantly lower in organic soil (mean = 26.3 ± 6.9) compared to unburned controls (organic soil, mean = 30.7 ± 6.4; ANOVA, p = 0.04) (Fig. 4). There was no difference in C:N ratios between burned and unburned sandy soil horizons. The interaction between site type (organic vs. sandy) and heat dose treatment duration in ANOVA model for C:N ratios was not significant. There was a modest decrease in C:N ratios with increasing DH in cores from both organic site and O horizons of sandy sites (Supplementary Fig. 9) (linear model, p = 0.04, \({R}_{adj.}^{2}\) = 0.10).
Due to difficulties in disentangling mass loss from water loss during a burn event, we estimated C and N mass pre- and post-burn by multiplying pre-burn soil volume by dry bulk density estimates and soil C concentration estimates from unburned control cores (Supplementary Table 3). Following the 120 s burn duration treatment, average C mass loss from the organic and sandy soil was estimated to be 1.2 ± 1.4 g and 0.2 ± 0.3 g, respectively. Average N mass loss from the organic and sandy soil was estimated to be 0.042 ± 0.05 g and 0.007 ± 0.012 g, respectively.
Burning decreased respiration rates
Total C respired as a percent of C remaining post-burn over the course of the 70-day incubation in cores from both organic and sandy sites was significantly lower in burned soil (organic, 120 s burn duration, mean = 2.1 ± 0.5%; sandy, 120 s burn duration, mean = 2.2 ± 1.6%) compared to unburned organic (organic, mean = 4.4 ± 0.4%; ANOVA, p = 0.0002) and sandy cores (mean = 5.4 ± 2.7%; ANOVA, p = 0.05) (Fig. 5, Supplementary Fig. 10).
Two-pool decay models resulted in good fits to respiration data from the 70-day incubation (Supplementary Fig. 11; R2 > 0.998). In both organic and sandy soil cores, burning increased fast-cycling C pool decomposition rates and increased the proportion of C held in the slow-cycling C pool (Fig. 6). Higher fast-cycling C pool decomposition rates (k1) were found following the 120 s burn duration treatment in both organic (mean = 0.1 ± 0.1) and sandy cores (mean = 0.1 ± 0.1) compared to unburned organic (mean = 3.8 × 10−3 ± 2.7 × 10−3; Kruskal–Wallis test, p = 0.007) and sandy cores (mean = 8.2 × 10−3 ± 6.3 × 10−3; Kruskal–Wallis test, p = 0.003) (Fig. 6).
Based on respiration measurements following the 120 s burn duration treatment, the fraction of C held in the fast-cycling C pool (M1) decreased in both organic (mean = 6.4 × 10−3 ± 3.7 × 10−3) and sandy cores (mean = 4.2 × 10−3 ± 3.3 × 10−3) compared to unburned organic (mean = 0.2 ± 0.1; Kruskal–Wallis test, p = 0.007) and sandy soil cores (mean = 0.1 ± 0.1; Kruskal–Wallis test, p = 0.007) (Fig. 6).
Discussion
Immediate effects of burning on soil differ with soil type and burn duration
Heat dose treatments of short and long durations resulted in a range of soil temperatures realistic to a natural wildfire event within a boreal forest. Temperatures at the soil surface during a crown fire can reach hundreds of degrees Celsius (DeBano 1991; Neary et al. 1999), although there is also a high degree of spatial heterogeneity for surface temperature and combustion (Lavoie and Mack 2012). Our two distinct durations used as heat dose treatments resulted in generally distinct temperature profiles, with longer duration heat dose treatments resulting in higher soil DH (Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig. 2), which allowed us to compare the effects of different heat dose treatment duration on soil properties and soil respiration.
High soil temperatures (mean = 169 °C) were reached in the upper half of the cores, but temperature rapidly attenuated with depth, consistent with the expectation that direct burn effects will largely be confined to surface soil horizons. This is supported by previous work finding larger reductions in microbial biomass in surface (≤ 5 cm) soils than in subsoils (Pressler et al. 2019; Johnson et al. 2023). However, maximum temperatures reached (Supplementary Fig. 3) and duration of elevated temperature were different between cores from the two soil types. The higher temperatures and higher DH recorded in organic cores compared to sandy cores (Fig. 2) were most likely driven by differences in the quantity of OM. The sandy cores were composed primarily of mineral soil, which is not susceptible to a large degree of combustion during a fire, and a thinner O horizon (1–4.5 cm in depth) at the surface.
In contrast, the organic cores were composed entirely of OM with no mineral soil. This OM was composed of partially decomposed Sphagnum moss with a low moisture content due to the drying period designed to represent drought conditions before the burn.
While we may expect large C losses under future fire regimes, the effects of fire on soil can be highly variable—i.e., individual patches of soil may have significantly different heating and combustion during a wildfire. For example, numerous studies have documented high spatial heterogeneity in the degree of O horizon combustion during a single fire with areas of unburned O horizon existing adjacent to bare mineral soil (Kasischke and Johnstone, 2005; Lewis et al. 2011). Thus, in order to understand the impact of fire on soil C cycling, we must consider variability in fire intensity. The temperatures reached during burns in this experiment reflect this heterogeneity. While temperatures were generally higher in organic cores, this was not a universal rule. For example, following the 120 s burn duration treatment, temperatures greater than > 300 °C were reached in 5 of 24 sandy cores, while only 7 of 24 organic cores failed to reach this threshold (Supplementary Fig. 2). Additionally, there were a few instances in which a core exposed to the shorter burn duration (30 s) reached higher temperatures than corresponding cores from the same site that were exposed to the 120 s burn duration (Supplementary Fig. 2). At the end of both the 30 s and 120 s heat dosing treatments, cores were removed from the mass loss calorimeter, but no steps were taken to stop ongoing combustion. As such, we attribute the cases of higher temperatures following 30 s burns relative to 120 s burns to continued combustion of OM after the completion of the heat dosing treatment.
High temperatures and longer heat exposures increase soil pH
Despite large variation in temperature and DHs across cores, our hypothesis that burning would cause an increase in soil pH was generally supported by the 120 s burn duration treatments (Fig. 3). While the shorter heat dose treatment did not have a large effect on soil pH, the positive correlation between DH and soil pH across all burned samples (Supplementary Fig. 5) is also consistent with our expectations.
Fire-driven increases in soil pH are attributed to ash deposition and thermal modification of OM (Giovannini and Lucchesi 1997; Bodí et al. 2014; Araya et al. 2017), with higher soil temperatures resulting in larger pH increases up to a point (Araya et al. 2017; Bárcenas-Moreno et al. 2022). Over time, erosion and leaching remove ash from the soil profile, resulting in soil pH returning to pre-burn levels (Bodí et al. 2014; Matosziuk et al. 2020). Our study did not include leaching or erosion, which may explain why we did not observe pH declining towards pre-burn levels over the course of the 70-day incubation (Supplementary Fig. 6). Another possible explanation is that the mechanisms driving post-fire pH recovery act over time periods longer than 70 days. The persistence of elevated pH post-fire has been documented years after fire in some field studies (Ulery et al. 1993; Dove et al. 2020), which suggests that any potential effects of pH on other properties, such as soil C cycling, could also be persistent.
The effects of fire on soil pH are further complicated by the myriad other mechanisms influencing pH, such as active acidification by vegetation. The organic cores in this study had thick layers of Sphagnum spp. growing at the core surface at the time of sampling. Sphagnum has been shown to actively acidify its surrounding environment by releasing uronic acid into soil solution (Rydin et al. 2006). We observed an increase in soil pH in unburned organic soil and sandy soil O horizons over the course of the 70-day incubation (Supplementary Fig. 6), which was unexpected. We believe that by incubating soil cores in the dark, we inhibited Sphagnum’s ability to engineer its external environment, which may have caused the observed increase in soil pH in unburned soil. In contrast, in the burned soils, since we killed the Sphagnum, this mechanism would not have been active, further explaining why we observed persistently elevated pH in burned soils. In mineral soil, we did not see a meaningful change in pH over the course of the 70-day incubation, which is also consistent with the previous explanation as the mineral horizons contained no Sphagnum. This highlights the role of vegetation recovery in driving post-fire recovery of soil function. Sphagnum has been observed to fully recover to pre-burn abundance within 10–50 years of fire in boreal peatlands and subalpine and alpine bogs (Kuhry 1994; Clarke et al. 2015), although less time may be necessary for the acidifying effects of Sphagnum to occur.
Burning decreased soil C:N despite small effects on total C and N concentrations
Our hypothesis that burning would cause a decrease in total soil C and N concentrations was not supported by our data (Supplementary Table 3; Supplementary Fig. 7), despite estimated losses of up to 3.5 g C and 0.12 g N from burned cores (Supplementary Table 4). Combustion of OM at and near the soil surface removes C and N from the soil, and soil C is lost more quickly than N due to lower temperature thresholds for complete C volatilization relative to N (Araya et al. 2017). While this does not necessarily affect overall C and N concentration due to the relatively large pool of C and N deeper in the soil that is mostly untouched by burning, larger C than N losses may explain our findings of lower C:N ratios in organic soils following the 120 s heat dose treatment duration compared to unburned soil (Fig. 4), despite the lack of significant differences in total C and total N concentrations (Supplementary Fig. 7).
Recovery of C:N ratios to pre-fire levels will likely follow vegetation recovery and the resulting changes of plant inputs to the soil OM pool. Litter and belowground inputs to organic soils consist of Picea spp. branches, stems, and needles as well as material from ericaceous plants and Sphagnum moss. While we did not measure C:N ratios at the end of the 70-day soil incubation, we would not expect significant changes in these ratios due to lack of plant inputs to soil in this study. However, microbial activity and differential mineralization of C vs. N could potentially drive changes in C:N over time.
In contrast to the organic soils, in mineral soils, we did not observe significant differences between burned and unburned C:N ratios (or soil C concentrations and N concentrations). Temperatures required to volatilize mineral soil components are much higher than those required for OM combustion (Neary et al. 1999); therefore, we would not expect to see significant mineral soil mass loss. Loss of C and N from mineral soil via OM combustion may occur at the top of the mineral soil horizon where the hottest temperatures are reached; however, temperatures rapidly attenuate with depth (Fig. 2), rendering high C and N loss at depth unlikely. Even relatively large losses of C and N from the top of horizon could be diluted beyond detection when mixed with underlying soil.
Burning and burn-induced changes to soil properties decrease respiration
Our hypothesis that burning and burn-induced changes to the soil environment would cause declines in soil respiration was supported by our data. Post-burn soil CO2 efflux as a fraction of total post-burn C from both organic and sandy soils exposed to the 120 s burn duration treatment was lower compared to unburned soil (Supplementary Figs. 10 and 11). This observation may be explained by a variety of factors, each of which we will discuss.
First, burning may affect soil respiration via direct effects on soil microbial communities. For example, heat-induced microbial mortality driven by high soil temperatures can lead to a decrease in microbial biomass following burning (Dooley and Treseder 2012; Pingree and Kobziar 2019). However, soil temperature rapidly attenuates with depth in the soil due to the insulating properties of soil (Beadle 1940) and, thus, mass microbial mortality (and OM combustion) is expected to be largely confined to the uppermost soil horizons. This is supported by lower subsoil temperatures than surface temperatures (Fig. 2) and by our previous work finding a large decrease post-burn in DNA and RNA concentrations in O horizon soil but not in underlying mineral soil after an identical 120 s heat treatment in cores from the same region (Johnson et al. 2023), indicating that decreased microbial community size may play a relatively minor role in shaping post-fire C cycling.
Numerous studies have documented correlations between decreased microbial biomass and decreased soil respiration following fire (Dooley and Treseder 2012; Holden et al. 2016); however, if microbial mortality imposed a large limit on soil respiration, in our study we would expect to see decreased decay rates for both fast- and slow-cycling C pools in two-pool decay models. Instead, our results show an increase in fast-cycling C pool decomposition rate (Fig. 6), suggesting that the ability of microbial communities to cycle C has not been seriously impaired by burning. Although the increase in the fast pool decay rate following burning is not likely to exert a strong influence on overall C cycling rates, given the small proportion of C held in the fast C pool, these results are in line with our previous findings of increased fast-cycling C decay rates and no impairment of total mineralization following burning (Johnson et al. 2023). Thus, although fire decreases microbial biomass, decreased soil respiration post-fire is likely often driven by other factors, such as burning-induced changes to soil properties, including pH and C:N ratios, resulting in an unfavorable environment for C degradation.
Soil pH may influence post-fire respiration rates by altering availability of organic C to microbes. Organic C, which sorbs more readily to mineral surfaces at low pH, is released from mineral surfaces and becomes more accessible to microbial degradation as pH increases (Kupka and Gruba 2022). Soil pH is also positively correlated with enzymatic potential for oxidizing persistent soil OM (Sinsabaugh et al. 2008), which is particularly relevant in post-fire boreal forest soils where microbes encounter thermally altered OM. Given this, we would expect increasing pH to result in increased soil respiration rates. Indeed in some instances, increasing pH in acidic soils to circumneutral levels has been shown to increase soil respiration rates resulting in increased soil C losses (Malik et al. 2018). However, in this study, we did not observe significant positive correlations between pH and C mineralization. Instead, we found weak evidence for a negative correlation between soil pH and total C respired (Supplementary Fig. 12; linear model, p = 0.04, \({R}_{adj.}^{2}\) = 0.10), suggesting that, following fire, any effects of pH towards increasing C mineralization rates are small or offset by fire-induced changes to other soil properties.
Similar to expected pH effects, in N-limited boreal forests, decreasing soil C:N could be expected to alleviate N limitation, leading to increased soil respiration, which is, again, opposite to our findings of decreased respiration rates post-fire despite decreased soil C:N (in organic soils). Using C:N ratios as a proxy for substrate availability for microbes admittedly relies on an overly simplistic conceptualization of C compounds post-fire, which brings us to a third factor that may be driving post-fire respiration rates—C remaining after a burn may be less available to surviving microbes.
Although we did not measure C chemistry directly, all the soil cores experienced some degree of partial combustion based on the appearance of ash and charred material at the soil surface. As OM and soil begin to heat up, volatile compounds like water vaporize and organic molecules begin to break down. Complete combustion leaves behind inorganic material in the form of ash. Incomplete combustion results in large, disordered molecules and pyrogenic OM, with a higher degree of aromaticity than unburned OM. With increasing temperatures of formation, pyrogenic OM contains more aromatic hydrocarbons and fewer aliphatic hydrocarbons (Wiedemeier et al. 2015), which may make this material less microbially accessible (Whitman et al. 2013; Weiglein et al. 2022). Amending soils with pyrogenic OM produced at temperatures > 300 °C has been shown to reduce soil respiration (Whitman et al. 2014; Santos et al. 2021; Adkins and Miesel 2021), through a variety of potential mechanisms.
The thermal degradation of organic compounds may also explain our findings of decreased C:N ratios with burning because, as previously noted, during heating, soil C is lost more quickly than N due to lower temperature thresholds for complete C volatilization relative to N (Araya et al. 2017). Thus, it is possible that depressed post-burn soil respiration rates in this study are driven by the alteration of OM to include more chemically recalcitrant molecules, despite a lower C:N. The larger proportion of soil C in burned soils (subjected to the 120 s burn duration treatment) held in the slow-cycling C pool relative to unburned soils (Fig. 6) is also evidence for fire-induced changes in soil C chemistry. Interestingly, we do document a brief period 1–3 days after the initiation of the 70-day incubation during which respiration rates in burned soil increase sharply to levels equal to or greater than unburned soil respiration rates, and then decline below unburned soil respiration rates (Supplementary Fig. 13). This pulse in respiration could be driven by a burn-induced release of nutrients from fire-killed and transformed plant matter and microbial necromass that is quickly depleted by microbial activity, leaving more recalcitrant forms of C behind. Future studies would be required to confirm the causes of this phenomenon. Additionally, we found no significant difference in the decay rates of the slow-cycling C pool in burned or unburned soil (Fig. 6), suggesting that burning did not select for microbes with enhanced abilities to degrade fire-altered compounds.
The intensity and duration of fire-induced changes to soil properties and microbial function may all contribute to shaping post-fire C mineralization over different timescales. Immediately post-fire, nutrient availability may be temporarily elevated due to combustion and the release of nutrients from microbial and root necromass. On the other hand, the combination of OM loss and decreased post-fire C mineralization rates due to changes in substrate quality, and hence C availability, may result in lower nutrient availability over some longer time.
C losses to burning as compared to changes in short-term C losses from post-fire soil respiration
While it can be difficult to quantify loss of soil C via combustion during a natural wildfire, through the use of soil cores and laboratory burns, we were able to estimate burn-induced C losses (Fig. 5). Overall, by 70 days post-burn, burned soils lost more C than unburned soils, but, for most cores, the bulk of this C was lost during the burn itself, not via post-fire soil respiration. In fact, post-fire soil respiration was depressed, in both absolute (per g initial pre-burn C) and relative (per g remaining C) terms. This raises the question of whether decreased respiration in burned soils relative to unburned soil may serve as a mitigating factor of C loss following fire. Given the timing of boreal forest burn seasons (generally late-June through August) and the relatively short growing season of circumboreal ecosystems, our finding of decreased respiration persisting 70 days post-fire indicates that effects of wildfire on soil respiration will play out over months to years.
The degree to which decreased post-burn respiration rates will offset C losses during a fire depends on the persistence of depressed respiration rates in burned soils. The results of this study suggest that post-fire respiration rates are largely driven by burn-induced changes to C accessibility for microbes; thus, a return to pre-burn respiration rates will likely depend on a combination of recovery of OM inputs to soil and decreasing reliance on thermally altered organic molecules over time. Recovery of soil OM inputs is dependent upon vegetation recovery, which can take years to decades post-fire (Palviainen et al. 2020). As fresh OM inputs increase towards pre-burn levels, the proportion of C in the “fast-cycling C pool” would be expected to increase. At the same time, thermally altered OM would not be increasing, so its role as a fraction of respired C would presumably diminish, although it is also the case that weathering of pyrogenic OM over time would be expected to increase its microbial accessibility, and hence its mineralization (Zeba et al. 2022). In a review of post-fire boreal forest soil emissions, researchers found that total soil CO2 fluxes continue to increase for 10–30 years post-fire (Ribeiro-Kumara et al. 2020), which supports the idea that as vegetation recovery plays out, the composition of soil C will gradually shift towards more microbially available substrates and respiration will return to previous levels. At the same time, total soil C pools will increase in size, driven by the recovery of inputs to the soil, thus offsetting the increase in soil respiration, and resulting in a net increase in—i.e., recovery of—total soil C stocks.
Given that the heat dose treatments increased the proportional size of the slow-cycling C pool (Fig. 6), and, by definition, the slow-cycling C pool has a lower decomposition rate than the fast-cycling C pool (here, by three orders of magnitude), thermally altered OM will most likely persist in the soil compared to unburned OM. The post-burn increase in the proportion of C in the slow-cycling pool may indicate that soil C losses during wildfires from OM combustion could be offset in the long-term to some extent by the creation of more persistent soil C. To understand drivers of soil respiration years post-fire, more work will be required, likely drawing on modeling long-term effects of fire on soil C cycling.
Conclusion
Burning of boreal forest soils altered the post-fire soil environment by removing material via combustion and volatilization, increasing soil pH, and, in organic soils, decreasing C:N ratios. Simultaneously, burning altered how remaining C cycles, causing an increase in the proportion of C represented in the slow-cycling vs. fast-cycling C pool as well as an increase in fast-cycling C decomposition rates. The combined effects of burning and burn-induced changes to the soil environment decrease soil respiration, and lower respiration rates in burned vs. unburned soil persisted for months post-burn. Persistence of depressed respiration rates implies that soil C lost during the burn may be partially offset by post-fire soil respiration over months to years. These effects were generally larger following longer duration heat dose treatments, which may be viewed as a proxy for more severe fire events. Future work is needed to explore the persistence of post-fire depressed soil respiration rates in situ.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available at ESS-DIVE under https://doi.org/10.15485/2438579. Code to analyze data and produce figures is available at GitHub at https://github.com/DanaBJohnson/fire-soil-properties.
References
Adkins, J., and J.R. Miesel. 2021. Post-fire effects of soil heating intensity and pyrogenic organic matter on microbial anabolism. Biogeochemistry 154: 555–571.
Alberta Climate Information Service. 2018. Agriculture and irrigation programme. http://www.mrcmekong.org/about-mrc/completion-of-strategic-cycle-2011-2015/agriculture-and-irrigation-programme/.
Araya, S.N., M.L. Fogel, and A.A. Berhe. 2017. Thermal alteration of soil organic matter properties: A systematic study to infer response of Sierra Nevada climosequence soils to forest fires. The Soil 3: 31–44.
Balshi, M.S., A.D. McGuire, P. Duffy, M. Flannigan, J. Walsh, and J. Melillo. 2009. Assessing the response of area burned to changing climate in western boreal North America using a multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) approach. Global Change Biology 15: 578–600.
Bárcenas-Moreno, G., E. Jiménez-Compán, L.M. San Emeterio, N.T. Jiménez-Morillo, and J.A. González-Pérez. 2022. Soil pH and soluble organic matter shifts exerted by heating affect microbial response. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19: 15751.
Beadle, N.C.W. 1940. Soil temperatures during forest fires and their effect on the survival of vegetation. The Journal of Ecology 28: 180–192.
Beaudoin, A., P. Bernier, P. Villemaire, L. Guindon, and X. Guo. 2017. Species composition, forest properties and land cover types across Canada’s forests at 250m resolution for 2001 and 2011. Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Quebec, Canada: Natural Resources Canada.
Berry, T.D., C. Creelman, N. Nickerson, A. Enders, and T. Whitman. 2021. An open-source, automated, gas sampling peripheral for laboratory incubation experiments using cavity ring-down spectroscopy. HardwareX 10: e00208.
Bodí, M.B., D.A. Martin, V.N. Balfour, C. Santín, S.H. Doerr, P. Pereira, A. Cerdà, and J. Mataix-Solera. 2014. Wildland fire ash: Production, composition and eco-hydro-geomorphic effects. Earth-Science Reviews 130: 103–127.
Bormann, B.T., P.S. Homann, R.L. Darbyshire, and B.A. Morrissette. 2008. Intense forest wildfire sharply reduces mineral soil C and N: The first direct evidence. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38: 2771–2783.
Bradshaw, C.J.A., and I.G. Warkentin. 2015. Global estimates of boreal forest carbon stocks and flux. Global and Planetary Change 128: 24–30.
Brandt, J.P., M.D. Flannigan, D.G. Maynard, I.D. Thompson, and W.J.A. Volney. 2013. An introduction to Canada’s boreal zone: Ecosystem processes, health, sustainability, and environmental issues. Environmental Reviews 21: 207–226.
Braus, M.J., and T.L. Whitman. 2021. Standard and non-standard measurements of acidity and the bacterial ecology of northern temperate mineral soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 160: 108323.
Certini, G. 2005. Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: A review. Oecologia 143: 1–10.
Certini, G., D. Moya, M. E. Lucas-Borja, and G. Mastrolonardo. 2021. The impact of fire on soil-dwelling biota: A review. Forest Ecology and Management 488:118989.
Christianson, A.C., C.R. Sutherland, F. Moola, N. Gonzalez Bautista, D. Young, and H. MacDonald. 2022. Centering indigenous voices: The role of fire in the boreal forest of North America. Current Forestry Reports 8: 257–276.
Clarke, P.J., D.A. Keith, B.E. Vincent, and A.D. Letten. 2015. Post-grazing and post-fire vegetation dynamics: Long-term changes in mountain bogs reveal community resilience. Journal of Vegetation Science 26: 278–290.
De Groot, W.J., M.D. Flannigan, and A.S. Cantin. 2013. Climate change impacts on future boreal fire regimes. Forest Ecology and Management 294: 35–44.
DeBano, L.F. 1991. The effect of fire on soils. In Management and productivity of western-montane forest soils. General technical report INT-280, ed. A.E. Harvey and L.F. Neuenschwander, 32–50. Berkeley: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.
DeLuca, T.H., and C. Boisvenue. 2012. Boreal forest soil carbon: Distribution, function and modelling. Forestry 85: 161–184.
Dooley, S.R., and K.K. Treseder. 2012. The effect of fire on microbial biomass: A meta-analysis of field studies. Biogeochemistry 109: 49–61.
Dove, N.C., H.D. Safford, G.N. Bohlman, B.L. Estes, and S.C. Hart. 2020. High-severity wildfire leads to multi-decadal impacts on soil biogeochemistry in mixed-conifer forests. Ecological Applications 30: e02072.
Elzhov, T. V. E., K. M. Mullen, A.-N. Spiess, and B. Bolker. 2016. minpack.lm: R Interface to the Levenberg-Marquardt nonlinear least-squares algorithm found in MINPACK, plus support for bounds. R package version 1.2-4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=minpack.lm.
Flannigan, M.D., B.J. Stocks, and B.M. Wotton. 2000. Climate change and forest fires. Science of the Total Environment 262: 221–229.
Flannigan, M., B. Stocks, M. Turetsky, and M. Wotton. 2009. Impacts of climate change on fire activity and fire management in the circumboreal forest. Global Change Biology 15: 549–560.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, and Unesco. 2003. Digital soil map of the world and derived soil properties. https://search.worldcat.org/title/Digital-soil-map-of-the-world-and-derived-soilproperties/oclc/52200846.
Frankman, D., B.W. Webb, B.W. Butler, D. Jimenez, J.M. Forthofer, P. Sopko, K.S. Shannon, J.K. Hiers, and R.D. Ottmar. 2012. Measurements of convective and radiative heating in wildland fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22: 157–167.
Giovannini, G., and S. Lucchesi. 1997. Modifications induced in soil physico-chemical parameters by experimental fires at different intensities. Soil Science 162:479–486.
Hanes, C.C., X. Wang, P. Jain, M.-A. Parisien, J.M. Little, and M.D. Flannigan. 2018. Fire-regime changes in Canada over the last half century. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 49: 256–269.
Holden, S.R., B.M. Rogers, K.K. Treseder, and J.T. Randerson. 2016. Fire severity influences the response of soil microbes to a boreal forest fire. Environmental Research Letters 11: 1–10.
Johnson, D.B., J. Woolet, K.M. Yedinak, and T. Whitman. 2023. Experimentally determined traits shape bacterial community composition one and five years following wildfire. Nature Ecology & Evolution 7: 1419–1431.
Kasischke, E. S., and J. F. Johnstone. 2005. Variation in postfire organic layer thickness in a black spruce forest complex in interior Alaska and its effects on soil temperature and moisture. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35:2164–2177.
Kasischke, E. S., and M. R. Turetsky. 2006. Recent changes in the fire regime across the North American boreal region—Spatial and temporal patterns of burning across Canada and Alaska. Geophysical Research Letters 33:L09703.
Keeley, J.E. 2009. Fire intensity, fire severity and burn severity: A brief review and suggested usage. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18: 116.
Kelly, J., T.S. Ibáñez, C. Santín, S.H. Doerr, M.C. Nilsson, T. Holst, A. Lindroth, and N. Kljun. 2021. Boreal forest soil carbon fluxes one year after a wildfire: Effects of burn severity and management. Global Change Biology 27: 4181–4195.
Knicker, H. 2011. Pyrogenic organic matter in soil: Its origin and occurrence, its chemistry and survival in soil environments. Quaternary International 243: 251–263.
Kuhry, P. 1994. The role of fire in the development of Sphagnum-dominated peatlands in western boreal Canada. Journal of Ecology 82: 899–910.
Kupka, D., and P. Gruba. 2022. Effect of pH on the sorption of dissolved organic carbon derived from six tree species in forest soils. Ecological Indicators 140: 108975.
Lauber, C.L., M. Hamady, R. Knight, and N. Fierer. 2009. Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75: 5111–5120.
Lavoie, M., and M.C. Mack. 2012. Spatial heterogeneity of understory vegetation and soil in an Alaskan upland boreal forest fire chronosequence. Biogeochemistry 107: 227–239.
Lewis, S. A., A. T. Hudak, R. D. Ottmar, P. R. Robichaud, L. B. Lentile, S. M. Hood, J. B. Cronan, and P. Morgan. 2011. Using hyperspectral imagery to estimate forest floor consumption from wildfire in boreal forests of Alaska, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20:255–271.
Luo, M. 2023. Impacts of subsequent fire on physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of preexisting pyrogenic organic matter. Dissertation. Madison, Wisconsin, USA: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
MacDonald, G.M., C.P.S. Larsen, J.M. Szeicz, and K.A. Moser. 1991. The reconstruction of boreal forest fire history from lake sediments: A comparison of charcoal, pollen, sedimentological, and geochemical indices. Quaternary Science Reviews 10: 53–71.
Malik, A.A., J. Puissant, K.M. Buckeridge, T. Goodall, N. Jehmlich, S. Chowdhury, H.S. Gweon, J.M. Peyton, K.E. Mason, M. van Agtmaal, A. Blaud, I.M. Clark, J. Whitaker, R.F. Pywell, N. Ostle, G. Gleixner, and R.I. Griffiths. 2018. Land use driven change in soil pH affects microbial carbon cycling processes. Nature Communications 9: 1–10.
Matosziuk, L.M., A. Gallo, J. Hatten, K.D. Bladon, D. Ruud, M. Bowman, J. Egan, K. Heckman, M. SanClements, B. Strahm, and T. Weiglein. 2020. Short-term effects of recent fire on the production and translocation of pyrogenic carbon in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 3: 507548.
Natural Resources Canada. 2019. Canadian National Fire Database. Edmonton, Alberta. http://cwfis.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/ha/nfdb.
Natural Resources Canada. 2022. National Burned Area Composite (NBAC). Edmonton, Alberta. https://cwfis.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca.
Neary, D.G., C.C. Klopatek, L.F. DeBano, and P.F. Ffolliott. 1999. Fire effects on belowground sustainability: A review and synthesis. Forest Ecology and Management 122: 51–71.
Ohlson, M., B. Dahlberg, T. Økland, K.J. Brown, and R. Halvorsen. 2009. The charcoal carbon pool in boreal forest soils. Nature Geoscience 2: 692–695.
Palviainen, M., A. Laurén, J. Pumpanen, Y. Bergeron, B. Bond-Lamberty, M. Larjavaara, D.M. Kashian, K. Köster, A. Prokushkin, H.Y.H. Chen, M. Seedre, D.A. Wardle, M.J. Gundale, M.-C. Nilsson, C. Wang, and F. Berninger. 2020. Decadal-scale recovery of carbon stocks after wildfires throughout the boreal forests. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 34: e2020GB006612.
Pingree, M.R.A., and L.N. Kobziar. 2019. The myth of the biological threshold: A review of biological responses to soil heating associated with wildland fire. Forest Ecology and Management 432: 1022–1029.
Pressler, Y., J.C. Moore, and M.F. Cotrufo. 2019. Belowground community responses to fire: Meta-analysis reveals contrasting responses of soil microorganisms and mesofauna. Oikos 128: 309–327.
Prince, T. J., M. F. J. Pisaric, and K. W. Turner. 2018. Postglacial reconstruction of fire history using sedimentary charcoal and pollen from a small lake in Southwest Yukon Territory, Canada. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 6:209.
R Core Team. 2023. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Ribeiro-Kumara, C., E. Köster, H. Aaltonen, and K. Köster. 2020. How do forest fires affect soil greenhouse gas emissions in upland boreal forests? A Review. Environmental Research 184: 109328.
Rousk, J., E. Bååth, P.C. Brookes, C.L. Lauber, C. Lozupone, J.G. Caporaso, R. Knight, and N. Fierer. 2010. Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME Journal 4: 1340–1351.
Rydin, H., U. Gunnarsson, and S. Sundberg. 2006. The role of Sphagnum in peatland development and persistence. In Boreal peatland ecosystems, 1st ed., ed. R.K. Wieder and D.H. Vitt, 47–65. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Santos, F., D.M. Rice, J.A. Bird, and A.A. Berhe. 2021. Pyrolysis temperature and soil depth interactions determine PyC turnover and induced soil organic carbon priming. Biogeochemistry 153: 47–65.
Silvani, X., and F. Morandini. 2009. Fire spread experiments in the field: Temperature and heat fluxes measurements. Fire Safety Journal 44: 279–285.
Sinsabaugh, R.L., C.L. Lauber, M.N. Weintraub, B. Ahmed, S.D. Allison, C. Crenshaw, A.R. Contosta, D. Cusack, S. Frey, M.E. Gallo, T.B. Gartner, S.E. Hobbie, K. Holland, B.L. Keeler, J.S. Powers, M. Stursova, C. Takacs-Vesbach, M.P. Waldrop, M.D. Wallenstein, D.R. Zak, and L.H. Zeglin. 2008. Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecology Letters 11: 1252–1264.
Thompson, D.K., B.M. Wotton, and J.M. Waddington. 2015. Estimating the heat transfer to an organic soil surface during crown fire. International Journal of Wildland Fire 24: 120–129.
Úbeda, X., S. Bernia, and E. Simelton. 2005. Chapter 6 the long-term effects on soil properties from a forest fire of varying intensity in a Mediterranean environment. Developments in earth surface processes 7: 87–102.
Ulery, A.L., R.C. Graham, and C. Amrhein. 1993. Wood-ash composition and soil pH following intense burning. Soil Science 156: 358–364.
Walker, X.J., B.M. Rogers, J.L. Baltzer, S.G. Cumming, N.J. Day, S.J. Goetz, J.F. Johnstone, E.A.G. Schuur, M.R. Turetsky, and M.C. Mack. 2018. Cross-scale controls on carbon emissions from boreal forest megafires. Global Change Biology 24: 4251–4265.
Weiglein, T.L., B.D. Strahm, M.M. Bowman, A.C. Gallo, J.A. Hatten, K.A. Heckman, L.M. Matosziuk, L.E. Nave, A.R. Possinger, M.D. SanClements, and C.W. Swanston. 2022. Key predictors of soil organic matter vulnerability to mineralization differ with depth at a continental scale. Biogeochemistry 157: 87–107.
Whitman, T., K. Hanley, A. Enders, and J. Lehmann. 2013. Predicting pyrogenic organic matter mineralization from its initial properties and implications for carbon management. Organic Geochemistry 64: 76–83.
Whitman, T., A. Enders, and J. Lehmann. 2014. Pyrogenic carbon additions to soil counteract positive priming of soil carbon mineralization by plants. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 73: 33–41.
Wickham, H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Wiedemeier, D.B., S. Abiven, W.C. Hockaday, M. Keiluweit, M. Kleber, C.A. Masiello, A.V. McBeath, P.S. Nico, L.A. Pyle, M.P.W. Schneider, R.J. Smernik, G.L.B. Wiesenberg, and M.W.I. Schmidt. 2015. Aromaticity and degree of aromatic condensation of char. Organic Geochemistry 78: 135–143.
Zeba, N., T.D. Berry, K. Panke-Buisse, and T. Whitman. 2022. Effects of physical, chemical, and biological ageing on the mineralization of pine wood biochar by a Streptomyces isolate. PLoS ONE 17: e0265663.
Zhao, B., Q. Zhuang, N. Shurpali, K. Köster, F. Berninger, and J. Pumpanen. 2021. North American boreal forests are a large carbon source due to wildfires from 1986 to 2016. Scientific Reports 11: 7723.
Acknowledgements
We thank K. Bourne and E. Lazarcik at the USDA FS Forest Products Laboratory for assistance with burn simulations; D. Letourneau and M.A. Parisien at Natural Resources Canada for assistance with field work; and J. Morin, T.J. Little, and other Wood Buffalo National Park staff for support in conducting this research (Permit WB-2022-41998).
Funding
This work was funded by the US Department of Energy (DE-SC0021022) to T.W. and B.N.S., which supported D.B.J., B.N.S., and T.W.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.W., B.N.S., and D.B.J. conceptualized and designed the study. D.B.J., K.M.Y., B.N.S., and T.W. developed the methodology. D.B.J. and T.W. developed the software. D.B.J., K.M.Y., K.K., T.D.B., and T.W. conducted investigations. D.B.J. wrote the original draft. D.B.J. performed visualizations. T.W. supervised and administered the project and T.W. and B.N.S. acquired funding. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, D.B., Yedinak, K.M., Sulman, B.N. et al. Effects of fire and fire-induced changes in soil properties on post-burn soil respiration. fire ecol 20, 90 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-024-00328-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-024-00328-1