Year | United States2
| Mexico3
|
---|
Area burned (ha) | Cost (USD) | Cost ha−1 (USD ha−1) | Area burned (ha) | Cost (USD) | Cost ha−1 (USD ha−1) |
---|
1983 | 81 000 | 56 711 069 | 700.14 | 672 127 | 2 254 658 | 3.35 |
1984 | 187 000 | 102 491 769 | 548.08 | 583 248 | 3 194 175 | 5.48 |
1985 | 741 000 | 249 250 324 | 336.37 | 375 907 | 2 235 556 | 5.95 |
1986 | 406 000 | 167 696 327 | 413.05 | 718 620 | 1 314 004 | 1.83 |
1987 | 1 281 000 | 368 538 256 | 287.70 | 710 050 | 702 895 | 0.99 |
1988 | 1 556 000 | 204 357 759 | 388.40 | 1 280 638 | 1 629 630 | 1.27 |
Average | 708 667 | 258 174 084 | 445.62 | 723 431 | 1 888 486 | 3.14 |
-
1 Costs represent Forest Service expenditure for emergency fire suppression.
-
2 Sources: US data from Fire Management Today, vol. 61 no. 3, 2001. United States Forest Service. Mexico data adapted from Gonzáles-Cabán and Sandberg (1989), with currency values converted from Mexican pesos to US dollars via Historical Exchange Rate Regime: [URL:http://intl.econ.cuhk.edu.hk/exchange_rate_regime/index.php?cid=17].
-
3 It should be noted that the Mexican economy was stressed during the 1980s, experiencing currency depreciation throughout the decade. This is evident when noting the Fire Program’s increase in spending (Mex. $) and the apparent decrease in spending when adjusted to US $. At either rate, as noted by Gonzáles-Cabán and Sandberg (1989), the increase in Mexico’s fire spending barely keeps up with inflation.