Skip to main content

Table 3 Tree characteristics of species sampled in study and included in data analysis. Species are arranged in ascending order of bark thickness using bark thickness equations in FFE-FVS.

From: Using Bark Char Codes to Predict Post-fire Cambium Mortality

Species

na

Mean dbh (cm)

Range

Distribution of bark char samples (% of total)

Cambium samples (%)

Unburned

Light

Moderate

Deep

Live

Dead

Lodgepole pine

1866

20.7

10.2–54.9

54

10

25

11

60

40

Whitebark pine

125

24.0

12.4–100.8

49

13

29

9

54

46

Western white pine

108

43.1

19.1–84.1

28

21

43

8

48

52

Western redcedar

44

28.6

17.8–52.8

33

10

37

20

39

61

Engelmann spruce

239

32.8

10.2–85.1

24

9

31

36

37

63

Western hemlock

226

33.0

13.5–69.6

23

18

57

2

35

65

Subalpine fir

475

19.7

10.2–75.2

41

12

27

19

44

56

White fir

1894

60.2

25.4–152.7

6

8

59

27

48

52

Incense cedar

790

51.6

25.4–166.4

4

10

59

26

47

53

Ponderosa pine

4084

47.9

10.2–178.1

6

12

70

12

62

38

Douglas-fir

1464

35.5

10.2–126.7

26

8

59

7

78

22

Western larch

391

39.2

10.2–98.8

16

9

70

5

86

14

Sugar pine

707

73.8

25.7–188.0

5

13

43

38

45

55

  1. a Four cambium samples were collected per tree.