Skip to main content

Table 5 Herb-layer cover, diversity (H’cover), and species richness (S) and average cover by growth form before the prescribed burn (1994), and the first (1995), second (1996), and tenth (2005) growing seasons after the prescribed burn for the ridge community at Wine Spring Creek, western North Carolina.

From: Long-Term Effects of High Intensity Prescribed Fire on Vegetation Dynamics in the Wine Spring Creek Watershed, Western North Carolina, USA

  

Cover (%)

H’cover

S per plot

S per sitea

S bW

S cH

1994

Pre-burn

35.57 (6.61) Ad

1.02 (0.22) A

18.2 (0.5) AB

28

21

7

1995

1 yr post

10.58 (2.56) B

1.97 (0.33) B

22.8 (1.7) A

53

24

29

1996

2 yr post

37.67 (2.57) A

2.01 (0.08) B

12.5 (1.0) C

46

22

24

2005

10 yr post

41.06 (6.19) A

2.25 (0.08) B

14.8 (0.4) BC

60

24

36

   

Cover (%)

   

Growth form

All woody

Trees + Deciduous shrubs

Deciduous shrubs

Evergreen shrubs

Forbs

Gram inoids

1994

33.27 A

5.27 A

4.22 A

28.00 A

1.22 A

1.30 A

(6.89)

(1.46)

(1.46)

(7.54)

(0.35)

(0.71)

1995

9.55 B

5.88 A

4.97 A

3.67 B

0.68 A

0.35 A

(2.66)

(2.87)

(2.74)

(1.69)

(0.15)

(0.18)

1996

29.38 A

17.92 B

12.04 AB

11.46 B

5.65 B

5.38 B

(1.37)

(1.80)

(1.90)

(2.15)

(0.68)

(1.96)

2005

28.98 A

21.24 B

15.91 B

8.00 B

9.10 C

2.72 AB

(4.84)

(4.53)

(3.96)

(2.08)

(2.05)

(1.90)

  1. aS = total number of species for the site.
  2. bSW = number of woody species.
  3. cSH = number of herbaceous species. Ridge burn plots where herbs were measured in every year (n = 6 plots [average cover of five 1.0 m2 quadrats per plot]). Values in columns followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05) based on repeated measures analysis of variance (PROC MIXED 2002–2003), followed by a Tukey-Kramer adjusted t-test. Standard errors are in parentheses.
  4. dValues in rows followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05) based on repeated measures analysis of variance, followed by a Tukey-Kramer adjusted t-test.