Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of fire environment and fire behaviour measurements for the 16 monitored fire runs.

From: Modeling Wildfire Spread in Mountain Pine Beetle-Affected Forest Stands, British Columbia, Canada

Observation numbera

FFMCb

WSb (km h−1)

Adjusted ISIb,c

BUIb

Duration of fire spread (min)

Observed ROSb (m min−1)

Predicted C-3 fire typed

Observed fire typed

Wx stnb distance (km)

1

91.3

11.3

10.5

65

75

16.6

IC

AC

31

2

91.0

26.1

21.2*

128

14

66.0

AC

AC

11

3

92.6

10.1

10.3

141

5

32.7

IC

AC

40

4

90.3

15.5

9.7

62

26

12.5

S

AC

39

5

90.0

10.0e

7.1

85

21

30.6

S

AC

27

6

93.2

4.1

8.6*

100

12

15.9

S

AC

14

7

87.8

19.5

8.4

78

3

29.7

S

AC

25

8

90.6

10.1

7.8

93

107

22.3

S

AC

5

9

92.5

9.3

9.8

93

3

28.9

IC

AC

5

10

89.2

7.7

5.0*

81

85

8.1

S

IC

32

11

93.0

14.2

13.4

81

22

19.1

IC

AC

28

12

93.0

14.5

12.1

79

74

13.5

IC

IC

28

13

92.4

11.0

10.6

88

182

23.8

IC

AC

25

14

92.0

10.2

9.6

88

169

19.4

IC

AC

25

15

87.0

10.0

4.7

70

22

2.7

S

S

0.7

16

90.0

11.0

6.5

111

35

2.6

S

S

0.7

  1. a Observation numbers match fire observation numbers in Table 1.
  2. b Acronyms follow Fire Weather Index System convention: FFMC = Fine Fuel Moisture Code; WS = wind speed; ISI = Initial Spread Index; BUI = Buildup Index (Van Wagner 1987). Wx stn = weather station.
  3. c Asterisks (*) indicate fires where ground slope was >5 %; for these, wind speeds were adjusted based on vectored slope steepness and aspect to yield adjusted ISI (using C-3 fuel type values), as per Van Wagner (1977b).
  4. d Predicted fire type was calculated using the FBP default foliar moisture content of 97 %. S indicates surface fire behaviour (<0.1 crown fraction burned, or CFB), IC indicates intermittent crown fire (0.1 ≤ CFB ≤ 0.9), and AC indicates active crown fire behaviour (>0.9 CFB), as per Forestry Canada Fire Danger Group (1992).
  5. e Wind speed on fire observation number 5 was inconsistent between nearby weather stations, and did not match with the smoke column characteristics and direction; 10 km h−1 was estimated based on smoke column appearance and fire reports.