From: Evaluating Prescribed Fire Effectiveness Using Permanent Monitoring Plot Data: A Case Study
 | Prescribed fire year | Burn severity | Season of burn | Included in analysis | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plot | First entry | Second entry | First entrya | Second entry | First entry | Second entry | First entry | Second entry |
3 | 1995 | 2006 | Scorched | Scorched | Late summer | Spring | X | X |
6 | 1995 | 1997 | Lightly burned | Unburned | Late summer | Spring | Â | X |
7 | 1996 | 2004 | Unburned | Lightly burned | Fall | Fall | Â | X |
8 | 1996 | 2004 | Scorched | Lightly burned | Fall | Fall | Â | X |
10 | 1996 | 2004 | Scorched | Scorched | Fall | Fall | Â | X |
1 | 1997 | Â | Scorched | Â | Spring | Â | X | Â |
2 | 1997 | 2008 | Scorched | Lightly burned | Spring | Spring | X | X |
4 | 1997 | 2008 | Lightly burned | Unburned | Spring | Spring | X | X |
5 | 1997 | 2006 | Scorched | Unburned | Spring | Spring | Â | X |
17 | 1997 | 2008 | Lightly burned | Scorched | Fall | Fall | X | X |
26 | 1997 | 2007 | Scorched | Lightly burned | Fall | Fall | Â | X |
12 | 1998 | Â | Unburned | Â | Fall | Â | X | Â |
13 | 1998 | Â | Scorched | Â | Fall | Â | X | Â |
14 | 1999 | Â | Scorched | Â | Fall | Â | X | Â |
47 | 1999 | 2007 | Scorched | Scorched | Fall | Fall | Â | X |
 |  |  |  |  |  | Sample size: | 8 | 11 |