From: Conflicting Perspectives on Spotted Owls, Wildfire, and Forest Restoration
Study | Subspecies | Parameter evaluated | Salvage logging | Owls or territories (n) | Fires (n) | Years post fire (n) | Response |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gutiérrez and Prichard 1990 | CSO | Density | UN | UN | 1 | 1 | − |
Gaines et al. 1997 | NSO | Occupancy | UN | 6 T | 1 complex | 1 | − |
 | Reproduction |  |  |  |  | 0 | |
Bond et al. 2002 | All | Survival | No | 21 owls | Multiple | 1 | 0 |
 | Reproduction |  | 7 T |  | 1 | + | |
Jenness et al. 2004 | MSO | Occupancy | UN | 64 T; 33 B | Multiple | 1 to 4 | − |
 | Reproduction |  |  |  |  | − | |
Bond et al. 2009 | CSO | Foraging use | UN | 7 owls | 1 | 4 | + |
 | Roosting use |  |  |  |  | − | |
Bond et al. 2010 | CSO | Winter moves | UN | 5 owls | 1 | 4 | 0 |
 | Roosting use |  |  |  |  | − | |
Clark et al. 2011 | NSO | Survival | Yes | 23 owls | 2 | 3 to 4 | 0 |
Roberts et al. 2011 | CSO | Occupancy | No | 32 sites; 16 B | Multiple | 0 to 16 | 0 |
Lee et al. 2012 | CSO | Occupancy | Â | 186 T; 41 B | Multiple | 1 to 6 | 0 |
Bond et al. 2013 | CSO | Home-range | UN | 7 owls | 1 | 4 | 0 |
Clark et al. 2013 | NSO | Occupancy | Yes | 143 T; 40 B | Multiple | 1 to 5 | − |
Lee et al. 2013 | CSO | Occupancy | Yes | 168 T, 71 B | Multiple | 1 to 9 | 0 |
 | Reproduction |  |  |  |  | − | |
Ganey et al. 2014 b | MSO | Prey abundance | No | 4 owls | 2 | 4 to 6 | + |
Tempel et al. 2014 | CSO | Occupancy | Yes | 74 T | Unknown Unknown | − | |
Lee and Bond 2015 a | CSO | Occupancy | Yes | 168 T | Multiple | 1 to 9 | − |
Lee and Bond 2015 b | CSO | Occupancy | No | 45 T | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Jones et al. 2016 | CSO | Occupancy | Yes | 45 T; 30 B | 1 | 1 | − |
 | Foraging use |  | 9 owls |  |  | − | |
Bond et al. 2016 | CSO | Foraging use | UN | 8 owls | 1 | 4 | 0 |
Comfort et al. 2016 | NSO | Use of edge | Yes | 23 owls | 1 | 0 to 4 | − |
Rockweit et al. 2017 | NSO | Survival | No | 96 T; 24 B | 10 | 0 to 25 | − |
 | Recruitment |  |  |  |  | − |