Skip to main content

Table 7 Fuel loading model selection results for the top five performing models and the null model for each fuel component. Type = vegetation type

From: Extreme wildfire supersedes long-term fuel treatment influences on fuel and vegetation in chaparral ecosystems of northern California, USA

Response variable

Model structure

k

AIC

ΔAIC

Litter depth

Treatment + type + year

9

367.9

0

Treatment × type + year

13

366.3

-1.6

Treatment + type × year

10

369.2

1.3

Type + year

5

371.5

3.6

Type × year

6

372.9

5

Null (random effects only)

3

610.4

242.5

1 h loading

Treatment + type + year

9

6.5

0

Treatment + type × year

10

8.2

1.7

Type × year

12

8.4

1.9

Treatment + year

8

9.1

2.6

Type + year

5

12.5

6

Null (random effects only)

3

31.7

25.2

10 h loading

Treatment + year

8

836.3

0

Treatment × year

12

835.3

-1

Treatment + type + year

9

837.2

0.9

Treatment + type × year

10

838.9

2.6

Treatment × type + year

13

843.0

6.7

Null (random effects only)

3

902.0

65.7

100 h loading

Type + year

5

1191.7

0

Treatment × type × year

22

1191.9

0.2

Treatment × year

12

1192.5

0.8

Type × year

6

1193.6

1.9

Year

4

1197.2

5.5

Null (random effects only)

3

1228.8

37.1

FWF loading

Treatment × year

12

1140.6

0

Treatment × type × year

22

1144.2

3.6

Type + year

5

1144.3

3.7

Treatment + type + year

9

1145.8

5.2

Type × year

6

1146.1

5.5

Null (random effects only)

3

1204.6

64.0