| Vegetation/fuel structure | Fire behavior | Fire management implications | Ecological effects |
---|---|---|---|---|
Herbicides to reduce annual grass fuel | ||||
Imazapic | • Decreases invasive annual fuels for 2–3 years • Invaders increase over time without successful restoration or repeated applications in areas dominated by invasive annuals • May reduce seeding success of native perennials with lesser effects on introduced grasses • Tradeoffs exist between reduced seedling establishment and invasive annual grass control | • Decreases rates of fire spread when used in conjunction with fuel treatments in relatively warm and dry areas | • Intended to decrease establishment and growth of annual grasses and forbs long enough for residual native herbs to recover and seeded species to establish • May prevent development of annual grass fire cycles where effective in promoting seeding success | • Imazapic is effective at reducing several annual grasses, but is only partially selective and may decrease residual native annual and perennial species as well as seeded species • Increases in relative resilience and resistance may occur where effects of controlling invasive annual grasses outweigh decreased seeding success and perennial grass recovery |
Indaziflam | • Decreases native and invasive annual fuels for 3–4 years • Invaders increase over time without successful restoration or repeated applications in areas with abundant invasive annuals • Results in consistent decreases in native seedbanks, especially annuals • In remnant native systems, decreases perennial natives and reduces seeding success in relatively warm and dry areas; has neutral or positive effects in relatively cool and wet areas | • No data found, but likely decreases short-term fire ignition, flame length and fire spread in invasive annual dominated areas • May increase fire spread in remnant native communities where perennial herbaceous species increase | • Intended to decrease establishment and growth of invasive annual grasses and forbs long enough for residual native herbs to recover and seeded species to establish • Effects appear highly dependent on site conditions • Desired results are more likely in cool and moist areas that receive relatively high summer precipitation | • Indaziflam reduces the seed banks of both native and invasive grasses and forbs • In areas with relatively low resilience and resistance (warm and dry) it appears to reduce invasive species, seeded species, and residual perennial species • In areas with relatively high resilience and resistance (cool to cold and moist) it appears to reduce invasive species, and increase residual perennial forbs and especially grasses |
Targeted grazing to reduce herbaceous fuel | ||||
High-intensity targeted grazing | • High-intensity grazing in areas dominated by invasive annual grasses decreases fine fuels • Invasive annual grass biomass can be reduced by 70 to 90% • Residual native perennial herbaceous species may be further decreased | • Vegetation stays green longer reducing flame length and rate of spread • Repeated high-intensity grazing in spring may prevent fires from carrying | • High-intensity grazing will likely require enclosures or protein supplements to concentrate livestock • High-intensity grazing to create fuel breaks may decrease fire risk and aid fire-suppression operations | • High-intensity grazing of annual grass dominated areas can decrease invasive annual grass cover and seed banks • Native perennial herbaceous species also can be reduced • Return to a perennial community following high-intensity grazing requires active restoration |
Dormant season targeted grazing | • Dormant season grazing decreases fine fuel carryover and increases fuel moisture in the following year • In intact Wyoming big sagebrush ecosystems moderate utilization appears to have minor effects on native herbaceous perennials | • Decreases in fine fuels with dormant season grazing may decrease fire ignition, flame length and fire spread where shrub fuels are relatively low • Greater flame length and fire spread is likely with higher shrub fuels (> 15%) regardless of reductions in herbaceous fuels | • Dormant season grazing that effectively reduces fine fuels, fire ignition, and fire spread may slow fire growth and aid suppression efforts | • Repeated fall (dormant season) grazing at low to moderate utilization rates appears to have relatively minor effects on composition of intact sagebrush ecosystems over time • Heavier dormant season grazing utilization rates or spring grazing has negative effects on perennial herbaceous species |