Table 6 Summary of model statistics from regression analysis of fire severity effects on California ground squirrel (Spermophilus beecheyi) abundance in Yosemite National Park, California, 2004 and 2005 (n = 10). Models are listed from best to poorest fit.
Model description | K | AICc | ΔAICc | w i |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Abundance{patch perimeter} | 3 | 44.69 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
Abundance{fire severity} | 3 | 49.07 | 4.37 | 0.07 |
Abundance{oak cover + patch perimeter} | 4 | 49.48 | 4.78 | 0.06 |
Abundance{patch squareness} | 3 | 49.83 | 5.13 | 0.05 |
Abundance{canopy cover + patch perimeter} | 4 | 50.15 | 5.45 | 0.04 |
Abundance{shrub cover + patch perimeter} | 4 | 50.52 | 5.83 | 0.03 |
Abundance{fire severity + patch perimeter} | 4 | 50.69 | 6.00 | 0.03 |
Abundance{trap week} | 3 | 50.98 | 6.29 | 0.03 |
Abundance{oak cover} | 3 | 51.75 | 7.06 | 0.02 |
Abundance{shrub cover} | 3 | 52.03 | 7.33 | 0.02 |
Abundance{edge distance} | 3 | 52.15 | 7.46 | 0.02 |
Abundance{canopy cover} | 3 | 52.23 | 7.53 | 0.01 |
Abundance{trap year} | 3 | 52.28 | 7.59 | 0.01 |
Abundance{fire severity + patch squareness} | 4 | 54.70 | 10.01 | 0.00 |
Abundance{oak cover + patch squareness} | 4 | 55.03 | 10.33 | 0.00 |
Abundance{shrub cover + patch squareness} | 4 | 55.63 | 10.94 | 0.00 |
Abundance{canopy cover + patch squareness} | 4 | 55.75 | 11.05 | 0.00 |