Fire Reduces Fungal Species Richness and In Situ Mycorrhizal Colonization: A Meta-Analysis

Dove, Nicholas C.; Hart, Stephen C.

doi:10.4996/fireecology.130237746

Fire Ecology

Table 2 Data used in meta-analysis of mycorrhizal colonization response to fire including control replicates (n _c), control mean (x _c), experimental replicates (n _e), experimental mean (x _e), the natural log of the response ratio (ln[R]), and change in colonization (%).

From: Fire Reduces Fungal Species Richness and In Situ Mycorrhizal Colonization: A Meta-Analysis

Reference	Guild studied^a	Unit of measurement	in situ or ex situ	Fire type^b	Repeat burn?	Years since fire	Biome^c	Location	n _c	x _c	n _e	x _e	ln[R]	Change in colonization (%)
Anderson and Menges 1997	AM	% colonized seedlings	ex situ	P		0.083	TF	Florida, USA	10	2.2	10	3.8	0.5465	72.7
Bacon et al. 2009	AM	% colonized seedlings	ex situ	W		33.000	TF	Arizona, USA	12	20	12	41	0.7178	105
	AM	% colonized seedlings	ex situ	W		5.000	TF	Arizona, USA	12	7.5	12	16	0.7577	113.3
	ECM	% colonized seedlings	ex situ	W		33.000	TF	Arizona, USA	12	60	12	75	0.2231	25
	ECM	% colonized seedlings	ex situ	W		5.000	TF	Arizona, USA	12	71	12	70	−0.0142	−1.4
Barker et al. 2013	ECM	% colonized seedlings	in situ	W		0.330	TF	British Columbia, Canada	18	44.9	18	22.9	−0.6742	−49.0
Barker et al. 2013	ECM	% colonized seedlings	in situ	P		0.330	TF	British Columbia, Canada	18	44.9	18	26.6	−0.5238	−40.8
Bellgard et al. 1994	AM	% root length	ex situ	W		0.083	TG	Australia	10	35.9	10	35	−0.0246	−2.4
Bentivenga and Hetrick 1991	AM	% root length	in situ	P		0.011	TG	Kansas, USA	4	13.3	4	11.6	−0.1382	−12.9
Buscardo et al. 2010	ECM	% root tips	ex situ	W		5.000	TF	Portugal	12	55	12	59.1	0.0719	7.5
	ECM	% root tips	ex situ	W	2 consecutive	5.000	TF	Portugal	12	55	12	60	0.0870	9.1
	ECM	% root tips	ex situ	W	2 consecutive	5.000	TF	Portugal	12	55	12	64.2	0.1547	16.7
	ECM	% root tips	ex situ	W		5.000	TF	Portugal	11	42.5	11	38.1	−0.1093	−10.4
	ECM	% root tips	ex situ	W	2 consecutive	5.000	TF	Portugal	11	42.5	11	59.1	0.3297	39.1
	ECM	% root tips	ex situ	W	2 consecutive	5.000	TF	Portugal	11	42.5	11	25.5	−0.5108	−40.0
Dhillion et al. 1988	AM	% root length	in situ	P	repeat unspecified	0.133	TG	Illinois, USA	10	75	10	39	−0.6539	−48.0
Glassman et al. 2015	ECM	% colonized seedlings	ex situ	W		1.000	TF	California, USA	26	100	22	85	−0.1625	−15.0
Hartnett et al. 1994	AM	% root length	in situ	P		0.250	TG	Kansas, USA	20	12.5	20	15	0.1823	20.0
Medve 1985	AM	% root tips	in situ	P		0.330	TG	Pennsylvania, USA	10	70.2	10	69.9	−0.0043	−0.4
Miller et al. 1998	ECM	% colonized seedlings	ex situ	W		1.000	TF	Wyoming, USA	3	38.2	3	62	0.4843	62.3
Miller et al. 1998	ECM	% colonized seedlings	ex situ	W		1.000	TF	Wyoming, USA	3	28.9	3	55.4	0.6507	91.7
Milne 2002	ECM	% root tips	ex situ	W		0.250	TF	Greece	3	29.24	3	16.59	−0.5667	−43.3
Raman and Nagarajan 1996	AM	% root tips	in situ	P		0.055	TrF	India	12	53.83	12	35.92	−0.4045	−33.3
Rashid et al. 1997	AM	% root length	in situ	W		0.417	TG	Pakistan	10	57	10	23	−0.9076	−59.7
Rashid et al. 1997	AM	% root length	in situ	W		0.417	TG	Pakistan	10	43	10	20.7	−0.7311	−51.9
Rincón et al. 2014	ECM	% root tips	in situ	W		14.00	TF	Spain	3	70	3	81.5	0.1526	16.5
Rincón et al. 2014	ECM	% root tips	in situ	W		3.000	TF	Spain	4	70	4	61.0	−0.1383	−12.9
Román and Miguel 2005	ECM	% root length	in situ	P		1.000	TF	Spain	5	26.2	5	18	−0.3754	−31.3
Schoenberger and Perry 1982	ECM	% root tips	ex situ	W		38.000	TF	Oregon, USA	4	74.6	4	57.8	−0.2552	−22.5
Schoenberger and Perry 1982	ECM	% root tips	ex situ	W		38.000	TF	Oregon, USA	4	74.4	4	79.5	0.0663	6.9
Senthilkumar et al. 1995	AM	% root tips	in situ	P		0.083	TrG	India	4	51.25	4	45	−0.1301	−12.2
Tipton 2016	AM	% root length	in situ	P		1.000	TG	Missouri, USA	4	33	5	59	0.5810	78.8
	AM	% root length	in situ	P		2.000	TG	Missouri, USA	4	33	2	60	0.5978	81.8
	AM	% root length	in situ	P		4.000	TG	Missouri, USA	4	33	3	59	0.5810	78.8
	AM	% root length	in situ	P		5.000	TG	Missouri, USA	4	33	2	18	−0.6061	−45.5
Torres and Honrubia 1997	ECM	% root tips	ex situ	W		1.000	TF	Spain	10	91.1	10	97.1	0.0641	6.6
Torres and Honrubia 1997	ECM	% root tips	ex situ	W		1.000	TF	Spain	10	91.1	10	75.6	−0.1871	−17.1
Treseder et al. 2004	ECM	% root length	in situ	W		3.000	BF	Alaska, USA	10	28.5	10	6.2	−1.5216	−78.2
	ECM	% root length	in situ	W		35.000	BF	Alaska, USA	10	28.5	10	49.2	0.5449	72.5
	ECM	% root length	in situ	W		46.000	BF	Alaska, USA	10	28.5	10	39.0	0.3131	36.8
	AM	% root length	in situ	W		3.000	BF	Alaska, USA	10	30	10	33.2	0.1026	10.8
	AM	% root length	in situ	W		35.000	BF	Alaska, USA	10	30	10	32.1	0.0664	6.9
	AM	% root length	in situ	W		46.000	BF	Alaska, USA	10	30	10	35.3	0.1624	17.6
Trusty 2009	ECM	% colonized seedlings	in situ	W		5.000	TF	Montana, USA	3	99.6	3	90.8	−0.0925	−8.8
Vásquez-Gassibe et al. 2016	ECM	% root tips	ex situ	W		1.000	TF	Spain	5	42.53	5	40	−0.0613	−5.9
Vásquez-Gassibe et al. 2016	ECM	% root tips	ex situ	W		1.000	TF	Spain	5	42.53	5	39.82	−0.0891	−8.5
Vilariño and Arines 1991	AM	% root length	in situ	W		1.000	TF	Spain	3	51	3	23	−0.7963	−54.9
	AM	% root length	in situ	W		1.000	TF	Spain	3	51	3	33	−0.4353	−35.3
	AM	% root length	in situ	W		1.000	TF	Spain	3	51	3	37	−0.3209	−27.5
	AM	% root length	in situ	W		1.000	TF	Spain	3	51	3	21	−0.8873	−58.8
	AM	% root length	in situ	W		1.000	TF	Spain	3	51	3	36	−0.3483	−29.4

^a AM = arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; ECM = ectomycorrhizal fungi
^b P = prescribed fire; W = wildfire
^c TF = temperate forest; BF = boreal forest; TrF = tropical forest; TrG = tropical grassland; TG = temperate grassland; TS = temperate shrubland

Back to article page